this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
449 points (73.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46650 readers
825 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

Devil's advocate:

These cost far less to maintain than having a team or two dedicated to upkeep for the trees.

That said, these things are a terrible idea, clearly the brainchild of clueless techbros, and overall a massive eyesore. Trees are objectively the better option. Just not Bradford Pear trees... Anything but the cum tree.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These probably require more maintenance and not less, glass needs to be regularly cleaned and water changed and fertilized, what will happen when company stops supporting this proprietary algae aquariums?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

All valid points.

I was going off the assumption that these are a sort of self-sustaining terrarium.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The "cost" of maintaining trees is paid by the city to people living, buying things and paying taxes in the city.
People who don't have a college education and get to make a living working outside, improving their neighborhood.

The fake trees are likely put up and maintained by a tech corporation from out of state.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Yes, yes, and yes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I don't agree that these are an eyesore, they are not as pretty as a tree, no, but disgustingly ugly? Nah.

Seems like a decent idea if you have an over developed location where you can't plant a tree.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Oh absolutely.