this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15429 readers
1780 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was he the guy that started that rental car company?

/s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

His customers lamented that driving was so boring and they wished there was some magical way for the cars to play music.

Oh well. Nothing to be done there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just straight lazy... Shame.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Hertz donut

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Half of the field is viable thanks to a single algorithm: FFT

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Faraday, after demonstrating how moving a magnet through a coiled wire induced a current in the wire was asked by a visiting statesman what was the use of this.

Faraday responded, "In twenty years, you will be taxing it"

Similarly, at a demonstration of hot air balloons in France, Benjamin Franklin was asked "Of what use is this?"

Franklin replied, "Of what use is a newborn baby?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything I've ever heard about Franklin makes him a boss. This is a new one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Here's a little known fact that is not true, which will bring some nuance to the previous anecdote, Benjamin Franklin ate babies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

British children! Maybe a few Prussians too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The British were John Paul Jones, but Franklin taught him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Another one that is true but sounds like an onion.

He enjoyed the company of GILFS

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because there is no hazard of Children, which irregularly produc'd may be attended with much Inconvenience.

I didn't need to know Benjamin Franklin fucks old ladies because they can't have babies, but I appreciate the honor of carrying this information.

also the idea of a genius putting a bucket on the head of a grandma he fucks and telling her to act like she's 21 is HILARIOUS to me

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This post tickles a fond memory of mine. I was talking to a right-wing libertarian, and he said there should be no research done ever if it couldn't prove beforehand its practical applications. I laughed out loud because I knew how ignorant and ridiculous that statement was. He clearly had never picked up a book on the history of science, on the history of these things:

  • quantum mechanics. It would be a shame if the poor libertarian didn't have semiconductors in his phone, or if he didn't have access to lasers for his LASIK surgery (which he actually did have), both of which are technologies built by basic research that didn't have practical applications in mind.
  • electromagnetism. It would be a shame if the poor libertarian was having his LASIK surgery and the power went out without there being a generator, a technology built by basic research that didn't have practical applications in mind.
  • X-rays. It would be a shame if the poor libertarian didn't have x-rays to check the inside of his body in case something went wrong, a technology built by basic research that didn't have practical applications in mind.
  • superconductivity. It would be a shame if the poor libertarian didn't have superconductors for an MRI to check the inside of his body in case something went wrong, a technology built by basic research that didn't have practical applications in mind.
  • radio waves. It would be a shame if the poor libertarian didn't have radio waves for his phone and computer's wifi and bluetooth to run his digital business, technologies built by basic research that didn't have practical applications in mind.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bullshit. Lasers have been intended to gain interplanetary superiority since the dawn of time. We just didnt know how to make them or that they could also be used to read music from a circle

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When talking with libertarians you should keep in mind they have completely different axiomatic values. It is often the case that they understand a certain policy would be on net bad for everyone, they simply don't care. They are rarely utilitarian about those issues.

I get along much better with libertarians who justify libertarianism with values extrinsic to just "muh freedom" -- they are usually much more willing to yield ground in places where I can convince them that a libertarian policy would be net negative, and they have also moved me to be more open minded about some things I thought I would never agree with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

You don't understand that's just Hanseatic understatement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Not really, he's not stealing something his dad made, using modern tech to smooth over the 60s parts and presenting it as his own invention.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like this is a very "scientisty" thing - the theoretical aspect is so fascinating and being able to fit all the pieces into a model that is mathematically accurate is the reward.

Considering the practical application of the model and how it can benefit society (or in other words, be marketed for profit) takes a different set of skills.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I absolutely detest the equivocation of "benefits society" and "marked for profit".

Plenty of things have been discovered to have practical applications which can benefit society yet are shelved or have its implementation frustrated because it cannot be exploited for profit or threatens the profits of a preexisting application which it would replace.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›