this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23006 readers
160 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Iberian ownership of Ceuta is older than Turkish ownership of Istanbul. it's been continually occupied since then, and Morocco ceded it by treaty in 1860. It feels to me like Spain has a better claim on Ceuta and Mellila than Britain does on Gibralter, and the Falklands, and Than Morocco does on Western Sahara,

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

It feels to me like Spain has a better claim on Ceuta and Mellila than Britain does on Gibralter, and the Falklands, and Than Morocco does on Western Sahara

Not true since all they both have zero claim on all of those ๐Ÿ˜

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The militarized borders aren't exactly neighborly. In fact, they seem to perfectly highlight the global north/south divide.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Old colonialism is still colonialism

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know enough about those countries political to give like an actual analysis of the situation, but isn't the obvious answer that countries usually don't like having enclaves within their territory?

Spain is opposed to British control of Gibraltar in the same way, and while Britain's claim is a bit more shaky, Spain's history of colonizing North Africa is going to make the existence of their enclaves in that territory an even more thorny issue than it already is.