this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
-8 points (42.0% liked)

Asklemmy

48279 readers
622 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As a somewhat frequent poster myself, I kind of miss the meaningless number going up. It lets me track how many people have seen the stuff I posted and cared enough to react

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There is an option in your settings so you don't see upvotes or downvotes on individual comments.

None of these imaginary points matter.

(Lemmy is rad)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

No I don't. It's just a dumb internet toy and I'm glad Lemmy and the Fediverse treats it like that. It used to annoy the fuck out of me with Reddit, where they tie your account to it. Too low or negative? Good luck posting anywhere or tripping the spam filter bot that thinks you're an evader so you get banned over it.

People have this idea in their heads that the higher their karma is, the more righteous they are and that they can't think or say wrong. When, based on experience, a lot of the time that people with high karma counts happen to be from the most insufferable bastard human beings I ever come across.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

No. I don't even like visible vote count. I think it hurts us more than it helps.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

In a number-go-up kind of sense, yeah - it's inherently gamification of social media and it is fun for some of our brains. However, I also think that karma or any other kind of "engagement accumulation" turns social media from a place of discussion into a competition for attention, where you're more incentivized to post solely for upvotes. Only a small minority takes posting seriously like this I admit it, but it does make the experience worse for everyone.

That's not to say the mindset doesn't exist without karma, only that it gets amplified.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

No. It encourages people to game the system instead of honestly engaging.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Some apps and front ends support showing your post and comment "karma". Eternity, for example

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

I feel about the same. I don't particularly care about it, but it's nice to know how many I helped. It was intentionally removed, I believe so it doesn't incentivise karma farms. If karma exists it will be used and there will be reasons to farm it.

Nothing a quick Postgres query can't fix though :p

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Kinda. At least there's per post karma

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

I don't even have a down vote button anymore and I low-key like it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm glad it's not a thing here because as a "positive" incentive I feel like it drives some users to vapid karma farming over actually interesting and new content. That said, I occasionally miss it when there's some unpleasant commenter douchenozzeling all over a thread and it's an easy way to see if someone is always an unpleasant ass or if they're having a bad day and otherwise make valuable contributions to Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

True. But we can just ban unpleasant douchenozzles

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Worse solution

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Kind of, and it was a good way to keep trolls and spammers out of sensitive communities, but unfortunately with bots and astroturfing existing nowadays, karma incentives terrible behavior.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

Ye kinda. But I'm so happy that it's gone. A lot people go wild when they see a number they can increase.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I get where you're coming from. You could revisit the contributions you've made and the messages and replies you've received. The difference is that those ARE meaningful and hopefully in a good way. I think Reddit actively pushes the concept of karma because it's an great engagement metric and they love that.

My opinion is that Reddit is captured and driven to push engagement for advertising revenue at the expense of meaningful interaction. Lemmy is a platform where that engagement metric is only intrinsic to the individual. People are here because they want to have meaningful conversations? Maybe I'm dreaming

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

That’s a good point. I was just thinking on it since I recently reached 500 posts. Might go scroll through them and look at some of the comments again

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

If you're dreaming, we're sharing the same dream.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago

Not only do I not miss it, I'm relieved that it's not here.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago

Never cared about the cumulative, only about the score on individual comments. Still got that, still get the little dopamine hit from looking at it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

If I cared about karma I would be on Reddit instead of here.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 weeks ago

Nope. I was on reddit for like 14 years and I couldn't tell you what my karma was because I cared so little about it. I paid a little attention to up votes and that's about it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 weeks ago

No, it just existed to block people from posting.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No, and I wish votes didn't even exist here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Votes are the only reason making a social platform social.

Juat look at Youtube comments, Instagram, Facebook, etc. None have downvotes.

Its somehow more social to see opinions on votes besides text.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think voting is completely unnecessary, and is a sort of "participation placebo" for the lazy but opinionated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Its more about reflecting on your own comment or post.

Here is a good post about this topic https://lemmy.ml/post/29375485

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I find a good amount of opinions in that post highly idealized and conceptual, but not really the end experience. Nevertheless, thank you for sharing the link.

I'd be more open to a voting system that rewards actual contribution. For example, a user is allotted (rewarded?) a certain number of votes for every post and every comment they make. The content creators and discussion participants drive the platform.

I'm sure a whole new set of problems would arise, but I feel it'd be a fresh experience, with less armchair warriors.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody needs to vote, but if most people do vote, makes it easier for everyone to find good content.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

The best content on this platform often has less than 10 votes. The most? The sociopolitical headline mill communities.

If certain people feel that's the good content, that's their prerogative. I don't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Now you’re conflating quality with popularity.

A popularity metric is still handy since there is no objective quality metric.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

That's a fair point.