this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
178 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38594 readers
453 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 day ago (10 children)

New data tells us that mining a single Bitcoin or one BTC costs the largest public mining companies over $82,000 USD, which is nearly double the figure it did the previous quarter. Estimates for smaller organisations say you need to spend about $137,000 to get that single BTC in return. BTC is currently only valued at $94,703 USD, which seems to be a problem in the math department.

Bitcoin mining will always be profitable for the people with the cheapest electricity and largest economies of scale. There is a difficulty adjustment algorithm in the protocol that ensures this. When the price tanks people turn off thier miners, difficulty adjusts downwards, and then it takes less electricity to find a block.

tl;dr title is wrong

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't believe this is necessarily true. Miners like Riot Blockchain are operating at a loss and other people are stealing electricity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah this article is woefully uninformed. Author seems to be butt hurt about GPU pricing rather than any serious interest in how the protocol actually works.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The quote is actually from the article this one paraphrased and linked to, while leaving out all of the actual, you know, information

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So wait. You'd have to read the article and not just the headline to know the story?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Now the prices of GPUs will go back to normal right?... right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the future, games will renders about nine pixels and it will all be upscaling.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Atari games are going to make a huge comeback

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Hey, sorry to break it to you, but there's this thing called "AI"...

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago

Bitcoin mining hasn't had anything to do with GPUs since 2014. Ether, since 2022. It's the AI people you're looking for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think GPU are used for bitcoin any more? You need ASICs to be able to hope for any return on investment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You mean getting paid for using energy is not a working business model? Was about time that the market found that out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Given the current price of bitcoin, I suspect the market still doesn't know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Mostly due to the fact that mining bitcoin becomes harder as more and more are found, and the "worth" of that work no longer exceeds the cost in electricity to do so.

In the past, it was basically free money, especially with how volatile it's value is/was

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Turns out the giant earth heater wasn’t the best business concept.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›