Yes, his offerings of "social media" are over. And that's great.
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
294 points (95.7% liked)
Technology
69300 readers
4136 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You heard it, the robot said we can go outside again.
Over?
Give me your profits, then.
Washed up trend chaser monopolist wannabe millionaire! Of course your social platforms are over: YOU MADE THEM SHIT!
May I be the first to say..
Social media said Mark Zuckerberg was over and sadly I think neither are right.
hell yeah! rest in hell
but tbh it’s not, old people love it
lol you didn't read the article
damnit you got me, i actually did read it afterwards and realised my comment was wrong but then just left it as it has 9 updoots
Hahaha relatable
He should know, he's the one that put a shotgun in its mouth over a decade ago.
Centralized for profit social media should be over.
Meta displayed a chart showing that the “percent of time spent viewing content posted by ‘friends’ ” has declined in the past two years, from twenty-two per cent to seventeen per cent on Facebook, and from eleven per cent to seven per cent on Instagram.
Yeah. By their design. If they would allow user control over what shows up in their feed, mine would prioritize friends' content. I'm not the one choosing to turn my feed jnto AI slop based on my alleged interest in the topic.
Also if I was just looking at friends’ content, it would be empty haha. Couldn’t scroll infinitely.
This. I have to go out of my way to even see my wife's posts (well, before I deleted Facebook).
2/3rds of my feed are ads.
This metric is bullshit because they fucked up the waters.
Try blocking her, the algorithm will prioritize her posts if you do.
Well, I deleted my account so that won't work. But that's crazy if that's true (not doubting you).
load more comments
(2 replies)
That's the reason I log into Facebook like once every week or two.
I like to make sure someone didn't die, and I miss the funeral.
Right? 'ZOMG users aren't viewing the contents of their friends!', yeah, because you hide that shit behind ads and promoted content, dumb-ass.
This is exactly why I deleted Facebook and Instagram. It no longer served it’s only purpose.
This is ironic because all the 40 year old chicks who are career users of FB since college, all cite the same justification for continuing to use it: "But all my photos and the current happenings of my friends".
If you showed them epirical data that only 17% of what they consume on the platform is actually even tangentially related to their friends and family, maybe they'd finally decouple themselves from FB.
And all the photos look like shit because they’ve been recompressed in JPEG, and all the metadata is just gone.
and all the metadata is just gone.
Just recently implemented immich. This hurts real hard.
load more comments
(1 replies)
you've got a point. they're trying to redefine what "friends" are. and they're succeeding.
One of the appeals of Bluesky (for now) is the Followimg feed that presents comments exclusively from people I follow, in chronological order.
Crazy that Facebook can't deliver this anymore
The technical complexity of showing a chronological feed of posts from subscribed accounts? Are you asking for one to scoff at thou peasant? You might as well request a toaster without bluetooth BAHAHAHA! BEGONE!
.order(created_at: :desc)
I don’t have a point, but felt like typing it in Ruby. Maybe someone else will have something snarky to say.
load more comments
(3 replies)
That's not a can't, it's a get-paid-a-shitload-of-money-to-not.
They can, but choose not to
And these new njmbers have shown that users are choosing not to use facebook.
They used to, but it didn’t boost ad engagement so they stopped.
load more comments
(3 replies)