this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
346 points (98.3% liked)

News

28993 readers
3968 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A number of party leaders are frustrated that Hogg, who has a leadership position in the party, is pushing primaries against some incumbents in deep-blue seats.

Democratic party leaders Thursday morning admonished officers to not take sides in primaries, addressing a situation involving activist and Democratic National Committee vice chair David Hogg.

"Let me be unequivocal. No DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election, whether on behalf of an incumbent or a challenger," DNC Chair Ken Martin said in a press call. "Voters should decide who our primary nominees are, not DNC leadership. Our role is to serve as stewards of a fair, open and trusted process, not to tilt the scales."'

As of now, however, the DNC does not have the power to remove Hogg if he refuses to stand down on funding primary challenges through a separate PAC — unless the body changes its rules, a senior DNC official told NBC News.

“Under the present bylaws, there is no action that can be taken against David Hogg without changing to the bylaws to extend that policy of neutrality to all primaries," DNC Finance Chair Chris Korge told NBC News. "There is no codified, legal way to remove an officer for doing what David Hogg has done because it only extends to the presidential race. "

Korge said that, as of now, the situation is to be addressed at a future meeting, likely in August.

Korge said he believed it was imperative for the body to formally change its bylaws because the party division the Hogg situation has caused harkens to an old ghost Democrats don't want to revisit.

“It smells like 2016, when progressives said the DNC had it in the bag for Hillary Clinton," Korge said, referencing angst in the party that the DNC had its thumb on the scale to block Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., from the presidential nomination. "No party official, no officer of the DNC, should do anything that would result in the division that was created by the perception that existed back in 2016."

On Thursday, Martin went on to say he had spoken to Hogg about what he perceived as a conflict but he did not expound on whether he gave him an ultimatum.

"I understand what he's trying to do," Martin continued in the press call. "As I've said to him, 'If you want to challenge incumbents, you're more than free to do that. But just not as an officer of the DNC, because our job is to be a neutral arbiter. We can't be both the referee and also the player at the same time. You have to make a decision.'"

In pushing back on Thursday, Hogg cited Trump's power clashes with institutions in saying the party needed to take more aggressive actions. He added that he had not violated any DNC bylaws.

"They’re trying to change the rules because I'm not currently breaking them. As we’re seeing law firms, tech companies, and so many others bowing to Trump, we all must use whatever position of power we have to fight back. And that’s exactly what I'm doing," Hogg said in a statement.

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

Let me be unequivocal: No DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election, whether on behalf of an incumbent or a challenger

Hah, right. The more accurate statement would be something like

As a DNC officer It’s only acceptable to put your thumb on the RIGHT side of the scale

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

'Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary' - Karl Marx

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Any options for sending them a message aside from the DNC contact form?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

They’re not getting it. They haven’t been getting it for a long time. A shakeup at the top is long overdue.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago

Rebuke away, ya dumb fuck Dems. What the young Mr Hogg is attempting — funding primary challengers to the most empty-suit Democrats — might be futile, might not, but you gotta respect the effort.

"Wake up, wake up," he shouts at the corpse of the Democratic Party, which will probably wake up only long enough to smack him away, and then go back to sleep.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dinosaurs face pressure, news at eleven.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hey many slammings = 1 rebuke?

Have to agree though, its so very unfair that Hogg is calling for any level of accountability for our reps performance in office. How dare he suggest our reps get off their arses and actually do any work at all for the democratic party, instead of just doing whatever the eff they want, including backing republican causes. Its outrageous.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Voters should decide who our primary nominees are, not DNC leadership.

Tell that to Sanders, Clinton, and Harris... That's just recent memory...

🙄 🤡 🤦‍♀️

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They straight up told us who the nominee would be against Trump. What a fucking joke. "Democracy is in peril so we have to suspend democracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago

Democratic party leaders Thursday morning admonished officers to not take sides in primaries

Lol! This, coming from the same folks that would rather back Republicans instead of progressives in their own party? Fuck these people. Primary them all.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Go David!

A Democrat politician is not a lifetime appointment. Right now if you aren't actively being the solution, then you are part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

How bout actually winning people over on issues instead of forcing people to have no other option? Are these circumstances not dire enough to warrant appealing directly to the people to determine their preferred candidate and not keep losing elections to absolute clowns?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The gall of saying that DNC officers shouldn't ever influence a primary nominee after them shafting Bernie in 2016, and foisting Biden and then Harris on us in 2024. Silver lining I guess is now they're on record as having that policy and are likely codifying it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a liberal who donated literally hundreds of dollars last year to ActBlue thinking I was saving democracy, Democrats have completely lost me. I’m done. After a loss as bad as 2024, how those Democratic leaders all stay in their positions is beyond me. Schumer, Jeffries, the entire DNC should’ve been fired and replaced. They are losers who made us lose to a fucking moronic orange rapist. And the fact that they’re STILL lying about putting the thumb on Clinton’s scale over Bernie’s in 2016 is as dishonest as it is infuriating. Fuck the Democratic party forever.

(For the record, will continue voting blue because the most corrupt democrat is better than the nicest magat, but we need a new party on the Left STAT)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (8 children)

We get the left party by splitting the Democratic Party. The Republicans are dead-old-white-men-walking, they will implode. I’m Team Hogg on this one

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Hogg is right and Martin is a fool. This do nothing say nothing change nothing is what got us here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Fuck the DNC.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

David Hogg bio

You can also learn about and/or donate to Leaders We Deserve

[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Note that the text OP posted above is NOT the whole article!!
IDK why that isn't made clear?

Since last week, Hogg has appeared on just about every cable news show and digital outlet, advocating for a party reset of sorts — not just because it lost the White House to Donald Trump, but also because, he said, it lost faith among voters.

David Hogg is right IMO, the party needs a reset, and the platform needs a reset. For one: Calling themselves the Democratic party, they really should work more to improve democracy in USA! As it is they are not really democrats any more than people calling themselves pro life when in fact they aren't at all pro life. What they are is against abortion rights.

Likewise the Democrats have helped maintain the status quo, in a dysfunctional flawed democratic system.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago

IDK why that isn’t made clear?

its a community rule not to post the whole article, so I posted some of it

[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The outrage is telling. Hogg is making an effort to introduce fresh faces and ideas at the primary level. This gives Democrats a chance to choose which ideas they want to go into play in congress. That is all.

If those voters are happy with what they currently have, the incumbent is safe. If not, those new ideas go up against opposing ideas. If a plurality like those ideas, they get to see them play out in congress. The only risk here is that they lose the seat.

Since at the moment, he's doing this in reliably blue districts, the risk is lower than elsewhere. This is a recipe for real change in the Democratic party for the better.

The only reason to fight against it so hard (that I see) is the protection of individuals' comfort at the expense of the welfare of our nation. It's evidence of moral rot in the the party that is threatened by true representation of the citizens' needs.

I support Hogg's efforts - as long as he does not have the morality of "boss Hogg". (For the kids out there who have no idea of what i mean, find and watch a season of The Dukes Of Hazzard.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Sweep out the old guard.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Controlled Opposition strikes again.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lmao and they can’t get rid of him, I fucking LOVE that.

Sucks to suck, status-quo old-guard fucksticks.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If they even fucking dare try its the very last time an entire generation votes D.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How dare he rock the boat when the current bunch are doing so well.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Hey man, we gotta be patient, the old guard is really busy doing absolutely nothing

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

There's totally moderates we can flip guys, totally! We're hot on their trail!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago

Oh c'mon! Insider trading, setting up offshore accounts and shell companies is work!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›