LGBTQ+

6372 readers

5 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC

Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Pedro Pascal Slams J.K. Rowling's Support for Anti-Trans Bill: 'Heinous LOSER Behavior' (www.thewrap.com)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

Whenever I see another example of how that woman is attacking marginalized people who are just trying to live their life multiple things happen:

I feel horrible for trans people - especially (former) Harry Potter fans. And I remember that her comments have real life impact directly and indirectly leading to more trans deaths both self inflicted and by violent attacks.
I wonder how I can best publicly boycott her work as she has stated that she sees any support for her work as people agreeing with her bullying
I remember that there is no way in which a well adjusted, mentally healthy, happy person would act this way. So I at least rest a bit easier knowing she’s miserable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

JK Rowling is a poster case of why it's a good idea to disassociate an author from their work (Harry Potter), followed by Anne McCaffrey (Dragonriders of Pern), Gene Roddenberry (Star Trek), and some more.

The saddest part, are the nonsense arguments her kind are using. I've participated in some trans communities, and the largest issue I've seen, is that some are breeding grounds for gaslighting narcissists. That would be a much more concerning point to address, than all the BS these people are spewing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think the concept is frequently called “Death of the Author”. It’s the idea that you can see a text or piece of art without as entirely removed from the artist themselves. In the case of Rowling I would argue this is a bad idea as she is actively seeing support for any of her work, regardless if fictional or otherwise, as active support for her view on trans people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 37 minutes ago

Not from the 800K+ fanfics , or in general from all the fanart.

The Death of the Author is a pre-Internet reflection on personal interpretation over an author's views.

Nowadays, it's way more than that: whole fandoms can tear an author's work to shreds, run with only the parts they like, and not look back. Rowling is no longer in control, or much of an influence, she's merely coasting on her previous fame for those unaware. Right now, most of the fandom is quite critical of her views, not only on trans people, but also some other troubling aspects of her work... and they make the overwhelming majority of works in the Harry Potter universe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The key difference is that McAffrey and Roddenberry are both dead, and see no benefit from you tuning in to Star Trek or reading a Pern book (though I might suggest Eathsea instead). Supporting paramount is probably not great, but i do not know of any direct harm they are doing. Rowling directly benefits from purchasing Potter media, so purchasing supports transphobia.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago

There is this:

Paramount Is Rolling Back DEI Initiatives to Align With Trump Mandates

...but guess that's been normalized now?

Fortunately, one doesn't necessarily need to purchase any of the media to enjoy it. When an author or publisher changes flags, so can people 🏴‍☠️

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just wondering what have McCaffrey and Roddenberry done/said to be included with Rowling? I'm OOTL on those two.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

McCaffrey took a turn towards homophobia, adding to her books that only inferior dragons would pick LGB riders, that then were used as a sort of cannon fodder, and a gold dragon queen would only choose strictly hetero riders because they were supposed to be breeders.

Roddenberry was a sexist nuisance, both on set and in the themes he tried to constantly write into the scripts. While claiming tolerance, he chased away some of the actors with his antics. Sexual tolerance themes got written more despite of him, than thanks to him, and mostly appear after he passed away. It can be claimed that he was "a man of his time", but still.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not sure how we feel about "protect the dolls" for a variety of reasons but we're glad he's showing support, and he's such a lovely guy from what we are aware of. 🙂