this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1024 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

6846 readers
1455 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

It won't even cover the cost of giving birth. This is some real "how much could a banana cost" energy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 28 minutes ago

Also, the cost of giving birth will magically jump up by $5,000 as soon as this passes. It was never a function of how much it cost to actually provide that service.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

monkey paw finger curls You get free healthcare coverage and half minimum wage for each child just for existing. However, you and your child must renounce your citizenship, forfeit your passport, and accept indentured servant status until you can buy back your citizenship after repaying the government child support in full.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 hours ago

Having a kid will cost you much more than 100grand. Giving you 5k to fuck is such an insult.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The type of person who would think 5k for having a kid is a great deal is exactly the type of person conservatives would bitch about having kids and leeching all the other government resources.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

Coincidentally, it's also the exact type of person conservatives want having kids. They make up the majority of prison labor, military fodder, and wage slaves.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

daycare costs $2k a month? are they training the kids to be astronauts?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

No, just extracting the maximum possible amount of profit, it's the American way. And 2k is the low end.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

$2k gets you Jimmy "Boots" McClusky, on day release from the work farm.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

Wow, two months rent for having a baby. That should fix it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Putin did the same thing, he aware 16k equivalent for having 10+ children .

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 hours ago

It really is a bummer to have such a legitimately retarded man just riding this country into the earths crust all Slim Pickens style.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Free daycare and free healthcare for people under 18 are two social services that would only benefit parents. How about free college tuition moving forward?

This is just a sad attempt making an exclusive version of establishment Dem stimulus checks...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Idk, it seems like US doesn't even have the basic shit going on, any of that is a good news.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Additionally, government supplemented/paid for day care is the only way to pay the teachers fairly. Given places often aim for 4 students:1 teacher, you already have a hard cap of 4*monthly fees for salary for that one teacher. I pay 1.2k/ month, so a teacher can get a max of 4.8k/month if EVERYTHING went to them, which we all know it doesn't due to taxes, administrative staff, utilities, facility fees, etc.

However, if they raise fees, they price people out of a much-needed service at a time when folks typically haven't reached their max earning potential yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

And folks wonder why parents these days are so old. Earning potential to afford daycare in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

They just cut head start, slashed medicade(51% of us babies are born on this program), no medicade no pediatric care for your baby either, cut hud, slashed the department of education, blocked student loan forgiveness, are dismantling the aca preventative care mandate, gutting worker protections, canceling child labor laws, laid off 275,000 workers and destroyed their livelihood and tanked the economy ……yea the birth rate is going to plummet. 5k lol doesn’t even cover a fraction of the utter devastation coming to American families from these moronic policies. Who in their right mind would want to bring a child into this racist sexist tech bro oligarchy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 44 minutes ago

yea the birth rate is going to plummet.

I'm not so sure. Impoverished countries have the highest birth rates. I can imagine the logic of the wealthy 0.001% being "if we make the rest of the country as broke as Somalia, the birth rate will also be as high as Somalia."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 hours ago

And all to fund tax cuts for the wealthy - who don’t need them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well, in a couple of years, some countries more than 50% of the population will be retired. Even a perfect democracy would not pass a law to improve young people’s lives so they can have time and money to have kids.

Just like in a perfect democracy, no affordable housing law will be approved because 66% of the population are homeowners.

Its unsolvable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Only if every person votes solely in their own immediate selfish interests. A collective mindset is necessary for a functional democratic society.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Correct, a "perfect democracy" requires empathy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 hours ago

Based on data presented here: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-true-cost-of-raising-a-child

It takes a minimum of $200K USD to raise a child from birth to 18; which works out to ~$1K/mo.

If the Government were serious in wanting to address the aging population issue, the best way to tackle it would be to provide family funding at this level for a family’s first ~3 children.

Would it be expensive? Absolutely it would be in the initial term - but the increase in economic activity would arguably more than cover it in the long run.

Would it lead to inflation? Not if the costs were derived from taxes due to the government (which currently get dodged), rather than through national debt.

Would it lead to a positive outcome for the nation? Arguably yes, but there may also be unintended consequences to the negative. Human greed knows no bounds, after all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Add an extra zero to that. Then we might consider

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

That's a weird way of wording "You'll only have to pay 95K out of your 100K bill of your hospital stay for giving birth"

5K PER MONTH and paying for the full hospital bill would be a great place start. But of course, they aren't really pro-life to begin with.

Pro-Birth =/= Pro-Life

They don't care what happens after birth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

$100k wtf? I only remember paying for parking at the hospital...evil socialism!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

In a lot of places 5K a month covers daycare, and not much more

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Let them get braces.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

I sometimes joke with my kids and call them Lamborghini 1 and 2, because that's how much money it was suggested you would need for each kid, and I'm sure that has doubled or tripled by now.

load more comments
view more: next ›