"at boosting rideshare safety, including by requiring drivers to make audio and video recordings of trips” Why is this a bad thing? Isn’t it also for the safety of the driver? What am I missing?
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
61 points (98.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2795 readers
1335 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Uber is neither the driver nor the passenger
That would be glorious. One down, 49 to go, and the District of Columbia.
Sounds like free business for Lyft
Has Uber ever followed through on those threats?
Good. The world will be a lot better without companies openly being allowed to shaft "contractors", "contributors" -- whatever the hell they want to call the people who should be classified as employees.
Okay, bye!
Companies play the threat game all the time. Just go, so a local startup that treats people better can take over.
hell yes
I got t-boned by an Uber driver who ran a red light
The people come first before some outsider company.