this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025

200 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

18008 readers

909 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Gaming on Linux

Matrix:

Telegram:

Gaming on Linux

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

200

On August 15th, 2025, Steam will officially stop supporting Linux distributions with a version of glibc older than 2.31 (help.steampowered.com)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To check which version of glibc you have, run ldd --version in the terminal.

top 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

I use Arch (btw) so I'm not worried about it

[–] [email protected] 21 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm curious, would running the Flatpak version of Steam "fix" this by providing its own glibc?

You know, for the people that want to stay on an old glibc yet are also comfortable with using Flatpak.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but which OS is still running glibc < 2.31?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Almost Linux Mint Debian (2.32)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Debian Trixie 2.41-7 Debian stable 2.36-9

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

I think they are preparing their next edition soon.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago

It should.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago

For reference, even Deban Stable has been at glibc 2.31 or newer for three major versions now, and another major version is on its way this year. I don't think this will affect many people.

[+] [email protected] -206 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Not even Linux users are safe. What was that promise Valve made some years ago? That they'd keep Steam running regardless of the OS version? Man have they U-turned on that shit.

Wow are the salt levels high, are you guys mining right now? Take a chill pill, christ. No wonder nobody takes linux gamers seriously.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. This might be the most down voted comment I've ever seen on lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

It is a sight to behold

[–] [email protected] 21 points 20 hours ago

They've never promised that, because that would be an absurd promise to make. This is no different from Valve dropping support for older versions of Windows, which they have also done.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

That glibc version might not be that old but they do this most likely because of security reasons. There will be a time when Valve will drop 32-bit support entirely as well. Also, you shouldn't use old distros because of the same reason. Currently glibc v2.31 is on Debian Bullseye which is the old-stable version and Valve still supports it. Technically there is no problem with that announcement.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Regardless of OS version? That sounds like nonsense. Only someone who doesn't know how Linux works would believe that.

glibc is a fundamental library that underpins Linux. Its been going since the 1980s and is constantly updated and patched.

Similarly the Linux kernel undergoes constant evolution and change.

No one can promise to support Linux regardless of the OS version because by necessity it is constantly changing. Even slow release cycle distros like Debian move forward with each major release. Backwards compatibility is actually a bit of a nightmare on Linux. Ironically it can be easier to get old windows software running on Linux than old Linux software.

People running systems older than glibc 2.31 really should patch and update their systems. That package itself is already 5 years old.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago

Backwards compatibility is actually a bit of a nightmare on Linux. Ironically it can be easier to get old windows software running on Linux than old Linux software.

I've been discovering this on Steam, actually. Square Enix released Linux versions of some games, like Life is Strange or the most recent Tomb Raider trilogy, but they'll crash at the main menu if you try to run them. Similarly, the Shadowrun games from Harebrained Schemes assume that you have a configured .asoundsrc file in your home directory, which likely isn't true if you're on a distro that has migrated to pipewire. The .asoundsrc issue is easy to fix by just making the file yourself, but LIS and TR have to use the Windows versions via Proton to run at all.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 22 hours ago

I don't think buddy knows the difference between a Linux version and a Linux distro.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You: *2 day old account*
Also you: *comes into linux gaming community and starts insulting everyone*

You're definitely the pinnacle of chill mate :)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago

The funniest part is their claim that people were being salty and should chill, at a time when there were almost no comments, and none were salty. Bot?

[+] [email protected] -68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's that got to do with anything? What does account age have to do with anything or are you just unnecessarily flexing to make yourself feel special?

That's like some 30 year old going up to a 13 year old and flexing because of where they are in life. It's just...pointless.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What’s that got to do with anything? What does account age have to do with anything or are you just unnecessarily flexing to make yourself feel special?

That’s like some 30 year old going up to a 13 year old and flexing because of where they are in life. It’s just…pointless.

Look at it this way: You just entered a clubhouse. Nobody there knows you. You have not yet put any time or work into maintaining the club or into establishing your credentials and social status among the members. After entering, you immediately make a controversial (and arguably badly-researched) statement.

Would you not expect to be much less likely to get away with a stunt like this than a long-established club member?

[+] [email protected] -72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Buddy, this is the internet. As far as the vastness of the internet goes, you're just as much of a nobody as people claiming I am. You pretend there is this elite sector of the internet somewhere where people with lots of karma or account history amount to something when it is nothing. I've been online for 29 going 30 years and I probably outrank you by that standard alone. But I don't go around telling people "HAY ERRYBODEH! I'VE BEEN ONLINE FOR 29 YEARS SO I'M MORE SPECIAL THAN YOU...AND YOU...AND YOU!"

Because no one cares. Okay? No. One. Cares. You're just initiating dick-measuring contests to inflate ego. I don't need your validation or permission like the other person seems to think so, to articulate what opinions I have. Deal with it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 16 hours ago

He's telling you that your social skills are terrible.

That may work on Reddit where you're effectively anonymous and people upvote edgy or outrageous comments but in smaller spaces if you're being an asshole then expect people to treat you like an asshole.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago

It's not some special club mate, and I definitely never said you needed my permission, I have no idea what you're going on about. It's literally just down to "this is likely a troll account because it's new". People who say inflammatory garbage and get themselves banned from communities go make more accounts to get around the bans. Considering how unpleasant you've continued to be, I'm leaning pretty heavily towards you being such a person. That's kind of the entire reason my client, Voyager (and many other clients) shows me the age of an account when it's younger than 30 days.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

No?

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What was that promise Valve made some years ago? That they’d keep Steam running regardless of the OS version?

You, umm, got a source for that? Because that sounds like an insane promise to make.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Dudes not worth my time to look this up for sure, but I'm fairly certain the statement was they'd support any Linux distro.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

OK... You do understand the difference between distribution and version, right?

You need to have a 5 year old distribution with no updates whatsoever to be at risk of losing Steam.

So, what exactly is the problem here?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

I'm on your side dude, I was saying chucklenuts up above was confused.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just get an OS that doesn't have versions. Ezpz fix.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

TempleOS?

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2.31 was released on 2020-02-01.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's surprisingly new. Wonder what causes the incompatibility

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The changelog for 2.31 is here:

https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-announce/2020/msg00001.html

Latest version of glibc is 2.41, released 2025-01-30. That puts 2.31 at least 10 releases behind. That version is quite outdated. There are numerous security and bug fixes in 2.31 alone, with each newer release also fixing some as well.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago

This might be the reason for requiring glibc 2.31 and newer:

Security related changes:

CVE-2019-19126: ld.so failed to ignore the LD_PREFER_MAP_32BIT_EXEC environment variable during program execution after a security transition, allowing local attackers to restrict the possible mapping addresses for loaded libraries and thus bypass ASLR for a setuid program. Reported by Marcin Kościelnicki.