this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
280 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

14394 readers
1773 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

4 four year olds doing an egg hunt of egg-sized eggs in a garden of area 10m sq with no undergrowth means we need 160 eggs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

How can you tell?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Make the eggs bigger

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Three 64 year old kids hunting a single 0.5m³ egg over a 12-by-8 metre garden

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Where did you get a dinosaur, or dragon egg?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Well I imagine that they were playing Jumanji, lost a go, and have now been trapped in the game for decades on a single finite square bound infinitely in all directions, searching for the one Parasaurolophus egg to free one of them from the game.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

(a+d)
a=area of garden
d= depth of undergrowth

Adding an area and a distance? Seems wonky.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

You need an area modifier for normally thin undergrowth clamped to a base, where multiplying would be too powerful. So you add as a general bonus to the area

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

It’s an empirical formula. Engineers don’t care about unit consistency as long as it works.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If we hold the hunt in a single tall blade of grass we'll need to fit a lot of eggs in there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Without units that's not really clear, could be depth in km

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The first part of the equation seems to make sense, the number of eggs does depend on the number of children, age of the children, and size of the eggs. Makes sense that each of the kids gets two eggs. Not sure why it's the square root of y, but okay.

The (a+d) part i just don't understand at all. Why are the physical properties of the garden relevant?

And yeah, as the other commenter pointed out, i wonder what units they're even using for some of this data

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Area would help account for a really large yard, where you may want more eggs, or for a small one, where this calculation simply has too many eggs. So, egg density per square foot (or whatever unit they wanted).

Undergrowth size to me seems like its accounting for how many eggs simply aren't found. If the grass is 6" long, you'll want more eggs because they'll not all be found.

This seems to fit especially because they're added together, which means even a yard that was just dirt, no undergrowth, you'd get eggs from area alone. There's a floor on it. If it were a separate multiple then no grass would mean no eggs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most of those seem like nonlinear relationships, so it still doesn't make any sense still. The undergrowth would only start becoming an issue when the height gets taller than the egg diameter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I agree, but that seems like about the level of detail a formula with no units would have.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I thought we were using potatoes so we didn't have to waste eggs!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What units should we use for the formula?

I'm going with weeks for age, teaspoons for size, acres for area, and leagues for depth.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

Some people will do anything except use SI units

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

The units don't really matter as long as you're okay with your number of kids coming out with units of square root time over length(?)