this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
491 points (83.2% liked)

Humor

8265 readers
1 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules


Read Full Rules Here!


Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.


Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!


Rule 3: No spamming!


Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.


Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.


Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.


Please report any violation of rules!


Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.


We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Every time someone vouches for ai to make “art” all i hear is “AI sets you free.” Not good, indeed very odd stuff.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

That's not the only meme it's referencing, OP.

DRRR DRRR

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

This is far side for millennials and i like it lol

Edit: Oh god it's AI trash. Sad

Report it and hopefully they'll take it down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's bland and the shapes aren't all equal squares from some direction. Some of them are rectangles from their 'square' direction.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In this case it's easy: There's multiple places where the cross-hatching doesn't make sense stroke-wise. The stippling is weird and overdone, can you imagine a human moving their pen like that? Why spend like 99% of the work on what's, thematically, negative space? ...that's because the AI has trouble understanding that cross-hatching is lines, and that dithering isn't stippling, it confuses an art style with scans of photographs printed in newspapers.

A human also wouldn't have gotten the shape of the arch and even more so pyramid wrong.

GTFO here with "soulless" that's the AI critique equivalent of "I can tell by the pixels". Of course this shit doesn't have soul it's, thematically, a fucking technical drawing. Sibs be saying "Plato was an AI, here, his drawing of the solids, they lack soul". You ever seen a dodecahedron with soul?

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm not an anti-AI absolutist, but for environmental reasons we should significantly cut down on the use of AI, especially for unnecessary things such as memes.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My GPU generates stuff in seconds that would take hours to make, once the model is trained it's pretty much no energy to use it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Okay fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mean if people use a self-hosted model on their own GPU that's really their prerogative how they choose to use their GPU and the energy it uses.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Totally disagree in free unnecessary short loves things is the most justified if anything. Would you be more hour editing a meme that may or may have not any traction that what it will probably live on the internet? Doesn't make much sense.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Bro, try editing this comment into something coherent.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

How and why are you spending more than an hour editing a meme?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

doesn't make much sense

Neither does this comment. Did you have it generated by AI?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›