this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
502 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23602 readers
2300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic National Committee vice chair David Hogg's plan to spend $20 million to primary older Democratic incumbents in Congress has sparked intense anger from some lawmakers.

(page 5) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The "intense anger" tells you this is absolutely the right thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Okay I usually take a hardline anti-DNC position, but I have to say this is good stuff. Go get 'em Hogg! However I do wanna point out that if Americans don't protect their right to free and fair elections none of this will amount to anything, so y'all still need to get stuff done on that front.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While this article by Axios and other recent ones seem to cast David Hogg in a bad, unproductive light, I am grateful that they brought attention to the matter.

Because I forgot to donate to his campaign, and I'm not going to be left out of that wave of support.

I do believe this is his organization's page, Leaders We Deserve:

https://leaderswedeserve.com/

I'm very proud of our young progressives. Go, David!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 month ago (6 children)

What the FUCK did they think would happen after the most catastrophic election loss in a generation? The DNC and Democratic leadership should have enough of a sense of the gravity of the situation we’re in to resign in shame. Instead they have the audacity to complain?? Seriously, understand how big of a failure you’ve been a part of and actually DO SOMETHING to help solve it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 212 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Where was the outrage when AIPAC dropped money bombs on progressive primaries to silence opposition against Israel and the Genocide of Palestinians?

The DNC is dead to most USians, the party leadership just refuses to acknowledge it even when their candidates and strategies lose to literal outright fascists.

No, this is the bare minimum I will accept in order to not consider the DNC my enemy.

Burn it down.

Also, age isn't the problem, the problem is money and a rigid party ideology.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dem insiders just don't have the same values as their erstwhile voters

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"What a disappointment from leadership. I can think of a million better things to do with twenty million dollars right now," swing-district Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.) told Axios.

"Fighting Democrats might get likes online, but it's not what restores majorities," she added.

The issue is we get majorities and then nothing gets done with depresses turnout.

We don't want to primary these old conservatives, we'd much rather them represent their constituents, but they've shown time and time again they won't.

We'd rather they get out of the way and resign, but they won't put the future of the party over their own personal power.

So fuck em.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I agree about "fuck em", let's get out with the old and in with the new.

But what majorities are you talking about? I keep seeing this repeated all over the internet- the sentiment that Democrats get nothing done when they have control. The problem is that I'm 33 years old and the Dems have only had control of the federal government for a few months of my life, and that's when they passed the ACA. I can't really make a judgement on what the Dems do when they're in power because they largely have not been.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (13 children)

So the best thing the Democrats could do when they had a super majority was pass the Republican healthcare plan? And you don't see why that's a problem?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

was pass the Republican healthcare plan?

Technically it was a more conservative version of the Republican healthcare plan...

But that comment also incredibly misrepresents how long Dems have held dual majorities, which is a much bigger issue.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Congresses

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The problem is that I’m 33 years old and the Dems have only had control of the federal government for a few months of my life, and that’s when they passed the ACA.

What?

We literally had it 2021-2023...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Congresses

And from 07 to 11....

What are you talk.ing about "a few months"?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

has sparked intense anger from some lawmakers.

Who gives a shit. What do potential voters think?

[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 month ago

Useless old parasites upset they are being dislodged from the host.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let me guess - the older lawmakers who voted for some of Trump’s cabinet nominations?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Exactly. And those older law makers get in the way anytime people want to even attempt to make things better.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›