this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
515 points (99.6% liked)

Hardware

1786 readers
46 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

To be clear, Synology branded drives are also third-party, but it's just third party they make money on. They don't actually make drives and there's no real technically valid reason behind this move.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Y'know, I was seriously contemplating a Synology for my first NAS this year.

Was.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Some companies make it too easy to choose their competitors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Well they've been a shit company for awhile. This just seals it for me. Garbage ass product anyways.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I really love my Synology NAS (DS220+). I don't anticipate needing to replace it anytime soon, but given how well it's treated me, I would almost certainly replace it with a 2024 model instead of a newer one if I had to, given this new limitation.

This decision from them seems short-sighted, I hope they reverse it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Well, at least they have put 2 links on their product page, to the Compatible Drives page, suggesting that other drives might not work.

For me, that only puts them in the "never buy" list and not in the "a crusade is coming" list.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I am very happy with my Terramaster running Truenas Scale.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

So glad I'm just using my PC

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Congratulations on the spineless, disgusting piece of shit who imposed this decision. I will look forward to burn my NAS and let them know my opinion, for fucking sure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Okay I guess I'll start scouring the internets for a quiet, low energy build

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

well after hearing this. when I buy a NAS i'll be going with any brand except synology

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Same! I was actually just looking at them. Glad I saw this first

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"third-party HDDs"

In my day we just called these... HDDs. Anytime something so ubiquitous has to be labeled third-party, you know who the bad guy is instantly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Third party ram, third party motherboard, third party cmos battery...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The end result of sniffing your own farts too much.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Haha wow what an absolutely HORRIBLE descision, wtf?! So glad I went with QNAP!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

So, it doesn't affect existing models, just the new ranges of NAS that will be released soon. And if you own an old one you can use it to format non supported drives and migrate to the newer models.

Pretty shit, but at least it's not going to majorly affect existing set ups.

I wonder if Synology will realise how bad of a move this is and one day roll it back. This will kill their consumer level market share, do they have enough of an enterprise market for this to make up the difference?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is unfortunate. My first NAS was an ASUS and it sucked balls to the point I made the switch to Synology and was able to get everything I needed working. Storage, external view access, connection to my apps. IDK what ima do when I need to move NAS solutions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

my first NAS was a synology and it sucked so hard I moved to QNAP, which sucked less but still was bad, so I learned to just make and use my own mini server.

I still remember their support telling me to open the SSH port to the public internet for their support team to look at it. fucking clowns.

load more comments
view more: next ›