this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
341 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23063 readers
3511 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump Administration’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has wrought havoc on the federal government, diminishing its ability to perform essential work—like administering Social Security benefits for retirees, weather forecasting to predict tornadoes, and environmental pollution cleanup—while creating new inefficiencies and increased public costs. Now, many Republican governors and state lawmakers are demonstrating their loyalty to the Trump administration by setting up state-level versions of DOGE.

Despite the novel branding, these initiatives are part of the longstanding right-wing mission to capture and consolidate government in service of the wealthy. In fact, Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s roadmap for deconstructing the federal government—which the Trump administration has followed almost to a T—is rooted in decades of state-level efforts to weaken democracy, suppress workers’ rights, and deepen inequality.

At least 26 states across the country have launched DOGE-style efforts purportedly related to “government efficiency” through legislation, executive action, or the creation of new legislative committees. While these initiatives vary, they all use disingenuous calls to “root out inefficiency” and “cut wasteful spending” as a smokescreen for the same right-wing agenda many conservative state lawmakers and their allies have pursued for decades: consolidating power in the hands of a minimally accountable executive, attacking public-sector workers, and cutting public services in order to finance tax cuts for the wealthy.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Ashamed to see my former home here. And it needs all those programs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Oh look, all the shit states are being shitty. Hope they shit themselves to death.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Oh look, it's all of the states run by conservative governments... and most have been run by conservative governments for MANY years. So they've been running inefficiently all this time?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think VT, NJ, and RI are on that list (of being run by conservatives) but it also seems those doge wannabes there are just proposed from a few conservatives in each of those. So unlikely to pass.

The conservative states.... Yeah. They'll do it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell, there is no DOGE NJ. Only some republicans in NJ supporting the idea.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

And never going to pass for sure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’ve only ever watched that clip and never the movie itself, but damn if I can’t hear that picture.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In case you don't know, it's from the film Oh Brother Where Art Thou. The film is an absolute trip, and it's a modern retelling of Homer's Odyssey but set in depression era US South. Great music and honestly just a completely hard to predict movie at every twist and turn

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We thought you was a toad!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

I’m the got-damn pater familias!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A more honest way to state the conservative, aka corporate America agenda is: we need to stop these poors and working class from taking more of our money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Like they pay taxes.

More accurately, "We need to stop these poors and working class from taking money the government can give to us instead!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Not paying taxes is part of it. If everyone making less than $100k was tax free and that tax was then being paid by the upper percentile, that is “the working class taking more of our money”.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Nothing wrong with government efficiency. The problem is that the phrase is just a dogwhistle for oppressing minorities.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Cut the right govt agencies and gain yourself more control. No oversight.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Government efficiency is really just the worst possible version of a product or service that the market will continue to accept.

And even that isn't what they're going for. They're just smashing the government to privatize everything. If a service doesnt get privatized, well you're shit outta luck

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No it’s not. Government efficiency is “not having to jump through stupid hoops to get things done”, not “reducing how much money the government spends”. For example, government efficiency is the IRS filling out my taxes for me - they already know what I owe them.

DOGE is just a misnomer intended to obfuscate the real goal, which you stated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I mean yeah you're right, that's what it should mean. But that's not what they mean by it. They want to "run the government like a business." That means cutting costs and distributing the cheapest product possible in order to maximize profit. It doesn't make sense, but it doesn't have to for their base to gobble it up.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nah, that's more Trump's shtick. Elon's goals are obvious: he's just trying to privatize everything valuable and destroy everything that can regulate him.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Elon is a white South African who has over a dozen kids because he's bought in deep to the "great replacement" theory. Let's not underestimate how racist he is.

Edit: oh yeah, and he also seems to have gone off the deep end when his daughter came out as trans, so let's not underestimate how sexist/LGBTQ-phobic he is, either.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago

It’s a lot like OpenAI where the name is a complete misnomer having very little to do with the nature of the business.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

They're emboldened