this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025

71 points (68.6% liked)

Linux

53156 readers

1057 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

I'm committing to Linux, but it's so unstable. Any suggestions? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

196 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey folks. I've had an on-again, off-again relationship with Linux for over 20 years. Usually, my attempts to use it are either thwarted by issues installing, issues booting, or general problems while using it... leading to “catastrophic failure” that I can't fix without digging into hours of research and terminal commands.

Windows 11 (even 10) are rock solid for me, even as a very heavy multitasker. No crashes. No needing to reboot, unless I'm forced to with an update, and really no issues with any hardware or software I was running.

But with Linux, I just can't believe how unstable it is, even when I do the absolute basic things.

I'm trying to learn why this is, and how I can prevent these issues from coming up. As I said, I'm committed to using Linux now (I'm done with American software), so I'm open to suggestions.

For context, I'm using a Framework laptop, which is fully (and officially) supports Fedora and Ubuntu. Since Fedora has American ties, I've settled with Ubuntu.

All things work as they should: fingerprint scanner, wifi, bluetooth, screen dimming, wake up from suspend, external drives, NAS shared folders, etc. I've even got VirtualBox running Windows 11 for the few paid software that I need to load up from time to time.

But I'm noticing issues that seemingly pop out of nowhere on the software/os end of things.

For example, after having no issues updating software, I get this an error: "something went wrong, but we're not sure what it is."

Then sometimes I'll be using Firefox, I'll open a new tab to type in a search term or URL, and the typing will "lag", then the address bar will flicker like it's reloading, and it doesn't respond well to my mouse clicks. I have to close it out, then start over for it to resolve.

Then I'll open a different app, sometimes it might open, sometimes it won't.

Or an app will freeze for no obvious reason, and I'll get a popup asking to wait or quit.

Another time I left my computer while I went out for a walk, came back, and it was like I just rebooted... all my work was gone, and it was starting fresh from the login screen.

I'm trying not to overload things, and I'm doing maybe 1/5th of what I'd normally be doing when running windows. But I don't understand why it's so unstable.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

FWIW, I'm not keen to switch away from Ubuntu, because I do still want official support if there's ever a problem with getting hardware to work.

UPDATE: Wow, I did not expect to get so many responses! Amazing!

Per suggestions, I ran a memtest86 for over 3 hours and it was clean.

I installed Fedora 41 and am now setting it up. Seems good so far, and elevated permissions can be authorized with biometrics! This was not something I had to. Ubuntu, so awesome there!

Any specific tips for Fedora that I should know? Obviously, no more Snap packages now! 😂

UPDATE 2: Ok, Fedora seems waaaay more stable than Ubuntu (and Mint). No strangeness like before... but not everything works as easily. For example, getting a bridged network adapter to work in virtualbox was one-click easy on Ubuntu... not so much on Fedora (still trying to get it working). And Virtualbox didn't even run my VM without more terminal hackery.

But the OS seems usable, and I'm still setting things up.

One thing I have noticed, however. When I search for how to fix or do something, nearly all websites and forums reference Debian/Ubuntu commands, so the fragmentation there is a little annoying

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Using only non american oss is literally impossible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

If you're using Ubuntu make sure you're using the most recent LTS release instead of the latest one. Stability issues shouldn't be a problem on those.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd love to know what hardware you are using as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's the 11th Gen Framework 13 running:

Intel® Core™ i5-1135G7, integrated Intel XE graphics chip
Western Digital Black 770 2TB SSD
32gb ram (16GB x 2) Crucial DDR4-3200

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm assuming stock ax210 wifi card as well.

I had a lot of stability issues on 11th gen Intel but I was using windows. (I have switched to an amd motherboard on my laptop (no it's not a framework))

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I'm using the Intel® Wi-Fi 6E AX210 No vPro®. It's been very stable, and highly performent (on Windows, at least). So far, no issues with Wifi on Fedora-based distros.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Mine had issues with integrated graphics where the driver would crash constantly.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

I see your edits and I had the same experience with Ubuntu. For whatever reason on my ThinkPad I had bugs and just weird issues that no one else would run into every single time. And I would try Ubuntu after every major update and it would still be some weird bugs never the same ones.

I've now been using Fedora for almost 4 years it's solid. I always recommend enabling RPM fusion to get those proprietary codecs and I like to change my zram config to what is recommended on the arch wiki.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I was told Ubuntu was a good beginner distro and used it for like a year and then towards the end of that year things got weird. So since then I've moved to arch, because it rolls so much and I don't keep up, it's even more unstable. I got some other laptops running bazzite (fedora based) and they seem ok.

So yeah, like your edited comment, I would recommend fedora or even vanilla Debian.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Surprised to hear stability questioned. We have RHEL systems at work that have been running 24/7 for over a year.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

From the look of it, I may just have really bad luck with Ubuntu and related distros.

I've been on Fedora for the last 24h, and it's been incredibly stable. Even heavy multitasking with Boxes running two VMs in the background! haha

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

The latest Ubuntu defaults to using Wayland. On my Framework, it would freeze the whole box every few days. I switched to Xorg, and it was much better. (It's an option on the login screen - just clock the little cog and choose Xorg before you log in.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

One thing I have noticed, however. When I search for how to fix or do something, nearly all websites and forums reference Debian/Ubuntu commands, so the fragmentation there is a little annoying

I'm using Nobara, which is based on Fedora, so I hear you, but the only thing you really need to do is learn enough about DNF to translate "apt" commands in your head.

And maybe set up a few aliases you're used to.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

People shouldn't HAVE to do that if they won't want to. You should just be able to use your OS, not learn a new language to use it "okayish"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A new language? It's one app.

And if you learn it, you are back to the same level of usage, not "okayish".

But yeah, no one HAS to move from Ubuntu/Debian to another flavor. (Which is what OP is talking about).

No one has to move off Win 11, either, if that pain doesn't make it worth it to them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I shouldn't have to learn where setting is in the windows UI every few years but that's just the shit we live in. I find Linux easier because I just have to change one word. In windows I got to go through three different setting panels. Same but different

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just search for what I need in windows. Haven't browsed through menus in years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

... You know there are menus with search in Linux just like Windows, right?

We're only talking about the people who want to use the command line.

It's less than the difference between windows CLI and poweshell. And if you're like "I don't use those", guess what? You don't need to in Linux either. You can run the update app.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've been running Linux for 20+ years as well (on-amd-off for most of that, but mostly on). Stability has almost never been an issue, only when I was fucking around and finding out lol. My biggest problem in recent years was Ubuntu never having what I wanted, and Arch always having what I needed.... So I just moved to Arch and things have never been better.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

This. If you're going to fuck around with your root, be prepared to find out. Most other problems is a quick search, "oh I don't have x dependency", and done.

Nowadays you just need to learn how to use Timeshift and make a save point before messing with stuff. System unstable after tinkering? Time to roll back. Linux is easier and more stable than ever before.

Just stay home, literally in your system, and you'll be fine 99% of the time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I started using Linux more or less full-time in 2014. I find it to be just as "stable" as Windows or OS-X, which is to say: it's stable until you do something that makes it not stable.

If you're staying in the mainstream, using a "stable release" from a big distro (Ubuntu, Debian, there are others...) and waiting at least 6 months after the release of that stable release before using it, I have found Ubuntu to be just as stable as Windows or OS-X. You might want to use an unstable app, that can be a problem in any OS, but granted: there aren't as many "stable" apps to choose from in Linux as Windows.

OS-X and their apps have burned me hard, repeatedly, for things that Windows and Linux had under control 10 years earlier.

The major difference in my WIndows vs Linux experiences has been: when you want something to work and it just doesn't, in Windows you have to shrug your shoulders and explain to your customers: It just doesn't work, there's nothing we can do. In Linux, you have the option to do the heavy lifting and make it work. It will frequently not be worth the effort, but if you're really determined you can fix just about anything in Linux.

load more comments