this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
505 points (98.3% liked)

politics

22985 readers
4017 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It’s the information environment, stupid.

Same conclusion as everyone. If Democrats want to survive, they have got to start pushing these online information siloes shamelessly like Republicans do instead of rambling on about issues, door to door, like it’s 1950. It’s like they’re fighting drones with swords.

It sucks. But if they aren’t going to reign in big tech and literally criminal media, well, they better join the mess they're complicit in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I better go to Costco and buy as many canned foods as possible huh?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Dunno about that, but I'm not great at economics. Seems to me that if people outside the country stop buying our food, the prices for that food here should drop pretty dramatically when they try and dump what they've earmarked for export here instead. The farmers are still screwed, but I 'think' we're fine since we're kinda the breadbasket of the world.?

Coffee and tea on the other hand xD Yeah, we can't grow that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are we, though? As far as I can tell from the stats, we're going to have a whole lot of surplus corn and meat, and not much else. And that's assuming we'll be able to feed the livestock, but hopefully we have enough domestic corn and soy to cover ourselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could get a years worth of green coffee beans right now before prices reflect the change. Learn to roast, it can be done cheap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Aaaaaand scamer get scammed.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 week ago (14 children)

This is a great article, more than just bait for "You voted for leopards eating faces and now you're surprised that a leopard ate your face" comments.

There's a great opportunity for Dems here, if they are willing to take it. Point out to the conservative little people that Trump's friends are the rich and powerful and the little conservatives will get nothing and like it. Highlight that Trump is hurting farmers so he and his rich buddies can get a tax cut. Remind them that the GQP doesn't care about people. It only exists to get stupid rich off of everyone's labour.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 week ago (10 children)

There's a great opportunity for Dems here, if they are willing to take it.

Probably not. Every time the leadership is presented with an opportunity, they choose to do the exact wrong thing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Thanks for saying this. In was about to, but you nailed it perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Indeed. Hence my 'if they are willing to take it' bit. They most likely aren't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wouldn't hold my breath if I was you. The current DNC is too afraid that they'll scare off the rich donors if they attack Republicans. They're worried about collateral damage if they take pot shots and accidentally hit one of the rich donors.

Both the GOP and the DNC want to focus on culture war bullshit rather than anything class related because neither wants to do anything that would run counter to the interests of the ultra wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Got it in stereo, even. Yep. I agree. That's why I put the 'if they are willing to take it' in. They most likely aren't because of what you cited in your reply, though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A lot of those donors are also the ones losing as well. Doing nothing accomplishes nothing. Might as well try.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

That's the hope, but I'd not plan for it!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Because they are fucking ignorant of how the world works.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›