this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
73 points (77.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1048 readers
20 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Context:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry for not seeing this earlier. Work was hell today.

Your correct. This isn't racism. I'm reinstating your comment now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

I left .world a while ago, I didn't leave Reddit to put up with the same bullshit on Lemmy

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is that actually a tolerable opinion in the sense of "paradox of tolerance"? Or is it hate speech that leads to intolerance?

Like "deport all jews from greater palestine" would mean ethnic cleansing which would not be tolerable. The only logical solution seems to be a 1 state solution that would need decades of investment, reeducation, de-nazification and de-radicalization on both sides.

Or said differently, "Palestine doesn't have a right to exist" is not tolerable right?

Historic arguments that wold have been valid 70 years ago are now not useful since the reality is like it is. Something like "USA doesn't have a right to exist, Europeans go home!" doesn't make sense either except in the hypothetical where it would .

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

'The Russians occupying Crimea cannot be deported that would be ethnic cleansing'. No it would not. There were Nazis occupying Polish houses and they were kicked out after WW2 and sent back where they came from.

'Deport all Jews from Palestine' would be ethnic cleansing as many Jews lived in Palestine before Zionism.

Palestinians have the full right to all their land back. If a European colonist is currently occupying it that is not their problem. The fact that their parents stole it in an ethnic cleansing does not change this in the slightest. Nor does them being Jewish mean that they suddenly get a special antisemitism exception to do colonialism and steal people's houses.

A good video explanation here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There were many historically German language areas in Poland and Czechia. There was in fact atrocities and ethnic cleansing there - not that this deserves any pity for most of the "former NAZIs". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_(1944%E2%80%931950)

After 50 years I don't think any reasonable person can make the argument that removing Jews from Israel is anything but ethnic cleansing. Not that I'd have any pity on those zionist fascists either, BUT it's beyond the pale to feign outrage over your "innocent comment" if this is your true opinion.

YDI

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

So what do you say about the Russians occupying Crimea? Would it be ethnic cleansing to deport them? Does Russia own Crimea because they ethnically cleansed it and then sent a few squatters?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Of course, two wrongs don't make it right! You can't hold the people living in an area collectively responsible for the actions of their regime (past or present). They are human beings.

I am angry too and I agree that the regime and a majority of the population of Israel has become fascist along with decades of crimes, terrorism and oppression, and should fall and be "de-nazied" like in Germany. But that is unlikely anytime soon. Best we can do is sanction them to collapse and punish those who support this regime.

The issue is that the fascist assault also has an impact on all of us, by making us angry and wish for simple solutions. Don't play into their hands by validating their claims about the "radical left".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Returning Palestinians property to them is not collective punishment. And since most Israelis serve in the IDF they are responsible.

Just because their grandfather stole something doesn't make it theirs. The owners are alive and they are required to return it. Any other opinion is pure racism.

Real justice would require Israelis to pay reparations besides the return of all Palestinian property.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They are drafted, and refusing to serve is not easy, and they are inundated by propaganda. And yeah reparations, land reform, wealth redistribution all would need to happen.

And if you're taking about the recent settlements (say like up to 20 years ago) and dispossession of Palestinians, yeah I agree. But there is a "statue of limitations". You can't unravel history. Humans in general who live somewhere and have build their lives deserve protection - no matter how they got there or what shitty and vile opinions they hold. It's not a property dispute if you want to apply this to a whole nation.

Personally I don't see this ending well. There are about a billion climate refugees coming in the next decades and things will get much worse generally. Israel will probably become isolated and eventually loose USA support and use their nuclear weapons. But after than it's quite possible Israel will indeed end with another holocaust. But I see no reason to hope for or argue in favor of that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

All Israelis have a country of origin they can go back to. These people are 'dual'-nationality'd up the whazoo. These are not events lost to time. Israelis are still actively participating in the disposession and theft of Palestinian land.

There is no such thing as "reverse ethnic cleansing". That would be like calling it 'reverse theft' when a thief is caught and the wallet is returned to the original owner. Their grandparents doing the theft does not make it any less theft.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

South Africa ended a similar system of apartheid and the effects of that, including the beneficiaries of apartheid choosing to leave the country (often to Israel so they could keep doing apartheid) were preferable to keeping the unjust system.

Saying Israel doesn't have a right to exist isn't the same as saying all Jews should be forced to leave. Ideally, if they want to then they should be free to live in a country where Jews and Palestinians have equal rights, including the right to vote, such a country would no longer be an ethnostate and would probably not chose to call itself "Israel."

load more comments
view more: next ›