this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
993 points (92.8% liked)

memes

14884 readers
5118 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: because a few comments make me worry that some are taking this seriously - this meme is a play on the type of hopeless dating posts you might find in less healthy corners of the internet. The joke is a suggestion that the real problem is that one man in the image has some sort of arrow-attracting superpower.

(page 4) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Oh man, one could supply an entire army with the arrows shot at that guy, I'll tell you hwat.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

The reverse reason is also that the pink blobs will receive arrows from all of the blue blobs. Blue blobs just reduce their market value that way.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

This is a depiction of why Kaladin can’t quite save all of Bridge 4 in The Way of Kings.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 8 points 1 month ago

The irony of the original graph is that if you draw the arrows that go the other way, they’re symmetrical.

Of course people are more attracted to attractive people. That’s literally why it’s called “being attractive”.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

ouch, my bones

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Notice how the third woman in line is aiming for the dick.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Poor #4 had to settle for knees.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Poor #4 had to settle for knees.

Settle? We don't kink shame here, sir.

[–] Octrom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This isn’t true at all. Everywhere you see average guys out there with girls. Yes, attractive people gain attention. But also, average people date.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It’s the reality of dating apps, not real world behavior.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago

It’s the reality of dating apps, not real world behavior.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Don't blame Boromir for your dry dick, for shame

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I know it’s a joke, but I feel like to be fair to both genders, each man here should arrows pointing to every woman.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The original image, and your extension, are an emergent behavior as a result of The Algorithm - due to "scarcity", Player B (men) is (are) encouraged to roll the dice as frequently as possible.

This whole dynamic is real, results in negative interactions for both players, and is intentionally set up by the apps to maintain engagement and extract as much money via pay-to-play advantages as possible. Dating apps are rigged to give men and women bad experiences so they (largely men) become desperate enough to pay $25 a month or whatever to have an unfair advantage.

The internet (and other players!) likes to hate the players, not the game, and the only "comfort" many young men have is Tate and Co.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dating apps are rigged to give men and women bad experiences so they (largely men) become desperate enough to pay $25 a month or whatever to have an unfair advantage.

It gets worse, as the engagement mechanic populates the apps with a particular kind of guy who is obnoxiously aggressive, persistent, and convinced that this is a game they can brute force with time/money. So women end up being introduced to a string of guys who believe they've "won" a date by "beating" the game while women are left fishing for profiles that don't look completely gross or insane.

And that's before you get into end-users who are straight up escorts or pimps or predators, fully internalizing the idea that site participants are just resources to extract.

It isn't merely about giving people a bad experience, but to give them a cheap thrill that keeps them coming back to the apps without ever finding a fulfilling relationship that would render the website superfluous.

The internet (and other players!) likes to hate the players, not the game, and the only “comfort” many young men have is Tate and Co.

Tate on one side and Estee Williams on the other. Men are told to treat women like a commodity - interchangeable, disposable, and ultimately hostile to your personal interests - that you rent out when you've accrued enough surplus wealth. Women are told to embrace submissiveness, obsess over superficial appearance, and pursue men based entirely on their socio-economic status in pursuit of the same kind of passive incomes that Tate is selling.

These conservative icons put men and women into an inherent contradictory position, with the idea of two people coming together as collaborators (much less romantic partners) is fully alien. You're purchasing a man's income with your looks. He's purchasing your looks with his hustle-money. You're both purchasing the other's status, with an eye towards a higher rung on the ladder. Neither one of sees the other as a life partner.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

with some exceptions... the abnormally skinny man has an unhealthy fixation on fat women, but its not love and anyone will do, and a few on each side are gay, some aren't interested in anyone at all, some only interested in themselves, etc

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Each genders experiences on dating sites suggest otherwise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So a possible answer is to live as a hermit in the middle of nowhere. And if a woman appears for some reason, she will have no choice but your long bearded, long matted haired, musk scented, disheveled, gaunt self as a possible mate.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago

Ah, the actual 'last possible mate in the world' strategy.

We must procreate for thr human species!

lol

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 102 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So what you're saying is to go to an archery field to find a woman! I've been doing it wrong the whole time!

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair warning, the naked fat guy with the bow and arrow is not Cupid. He is just an exhibitionist. An arrow to the heart will NOT make you fall in love.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vrojak@feddit.org 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You might not get hit on but you will get hit

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They definitely got the point

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments