this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
1698 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

7340 readers
3287 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Narrator: They did not, in fact, create jobs.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They don’t want a faster bureaucracy, or more efficient government. The goal in cutting funding for public services is to decrease the quality of services so that they can then trick people into supporting private companies in being awarded the contracts to provide those services (cut costs in the short-term so that they can justify higher costs later).

The goal is to DESTROY government and REPLACE it with profit-driven private interests. Capitalists are the enemy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I appreciate your response and that you also did the legwork to include the citable quote that I was negligent to omit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Glad to help. You are sounding the alarm, but not in a way that people will listen.

Just like project25 these guys have already told everyone exactly what they are going to do. And it will happen quickly.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Boomers: 1965 - that was like 30 years ago. Not taxing the rich isn't "new".

Gen Z: Well, ya, Washington had to tax them that much to pay off the debt from the revolutionary war. That was in 1976, right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Access to the domestic American market is what made most of these guys billionaires in the first place.

But the laws don't require them to return the favor.

A sensible solution would be to find a way to make the loopholes more expensive than returning some of those spoils in the form of some kind of tax.

Ideally that tax would create a positive feedback loop such as free higher education or other benefits to humanity that would continue to make the USA a better place to live and survive.

If the tax is too high or is used in a way that seems frivolous to the rich they will fight it so hard that it could never succeed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

IRS expects DOGE cost the country half a trillion dollars so far. Bankruptcy is the point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I bet Drumpf cuts taxes completely for the mega rich. You wait and see.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Less popular opinion. If we drive taxes up on the rich they’ll just get more creative with tax avoidance or move to Panama.

The ultra wealthy don’t pay income taxes and they didn’t in 1950 either. They’re mostly paying capital gains which was lower back then then it is now.

What we really need to do is remove all the massive loopholes in the current tax code and maybe do something like having progressive tax brackets on capital gains (some people are legitimately just using capital gains as retirement income).

Also, fund the IRS more. They’re not the evil tax man. They are finding the people who aren’t paying their legal fair share.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

sarcasm: that's why all countries in europe who do tax their rich have zero billionairs, they all fled to the us where you can't even study abroad without being detained and tortured

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

European countries have scaled back taxes on the rich because they started fleeing. That’s exactly what I’m referencing. NPR article

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's so bad about the ultra wealthy moving out?

Genuine question.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would already help if they would actually pay those 37%. But with the tax avoidance they can afford to get, they usually pay nothing at all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The same way cutting the budget of poorly performing schools makes students more successful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Hack and slash your children's education away, they say

load more comments
view more: next ›