this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1324 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23015 readers
4175 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Atlantic has published unredacted attack plans (non-paywall link) shared in a Signal group chat of senior Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg released the full texts after officials denied sharing war plans or classified information, arguing transparency was necessary amid accusations of dishonesty.

The leaked messages detailed U.S. military strikes targeting Houthis in Yemen.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 136 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (23 children)

Lmao Waltz saying he is going to try and figure out "how the heck he got into this room" and then the first text screenshot literally says "Michael Waltz added you to the group" is so goddamn hilarious to me.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

They dropped the guy’s girlfriend’s apartment building on him to kill him.

Hope it was a townhouse and not a tower.
The fucking disregard for human life.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (53 children)

So thankful we avoided GeNoCiDe JoE!

This is way better! …but then again, the world is only black or white… so maybe not. I guess the internet wanted this and so here we are.

load more comments (53 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

OK extremely explosive texts sent via signal, a no go because of security concerns and people screaming. Yeah wtf how much have you been upside down? American ISP's and important infrastructure has been completely hacked with the Chinese for a long time (thus certainly also forwarding to Russia) and Trump has ended all attempts against what companies directly and lets the attackers continue peacefully in. Not a no go? No uprising? So if Russia and China can secretly monitor all traffic in America (so that end devices can also be infected and messages can be attacked directly even before anything is encrypted) is that absolutely ok...?

Dafuq wtf

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Why do people even fight for these clowns?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ, they're just so fucking stupid. This is the kind of thing that would see employees of a major corporation fired in an instant, but I just know that these careless chucklefucks are going to be in my news feed for a while yet, possibly another four years so long as they keep currying the favour of Trump. This shit is pathetic, the rest of the world is embarrassed on behalf of American citizens for having to deal with this incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

Why only four years? What happens after then?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If there's one thing that "both sides" agree on, it's that it's ok to murder people in Yemen. Just don't mess up the genociding with poor OpSec, because that's a problem. smh.

These people won't get in trouble because they're serving fascism. It doesn't matter if they leak their wacko plans because they're attacking impoverished non-white people on the other side of the planet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Are your smh transmissions being downplayed? You need the all new:

smh adapter

compliments of: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35066328

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

If you've enjoyed this episode of Henchmen Behaving Badly, be sure to check out our channel on OnlyPlans!

[–] [email protected] 209 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

A CIA spokesperson asked us to withhold the name of John Ratcliffe’s chief of staff, which Ratcliffe had shared in the Signal chain, because CIA intelligence officers are traditionally not publicly identified. Ratcliffe had testified earlier yesterday that the officer is not undercover and said it was “completely appropriate” to share their name in the Signal conversation. We will continue to withhold the name of the officer. Otherwise, the messages are unredacted.

The news outlet these fucktards accidentally leaked their detailed operational plan and timeline to...

... is still excersizing better OPSEC than the actual head of the CIA.

EDIT:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_2sODSpJo2A

Watch this clip of Mark Kelly with some pretty on point questions for Gabbard and Ratcliffe, listen to their responses, and go read through the full text chat.

Watch more of the hearings.

I think there's a pretty decent case Tulsi actually fucked up enough in her testimony that she actually did a perjury, Ratcliffe however, was both a bit more conciliatory and ever so slightly more honest, and also a bit better at just giving 'I don't recall' answers.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly.

Gabbard tried to be more clever than she actually is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Well, we all knew they would be damning as fuck and they are damning as fuck.

How they goaded him into releasing those damning as fuck texts instead of just saying "sorry, we fucked up" is beyond me but here we find ourselves.

Feel like they're gonna throw Hegseth under the bus now.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago

Remember "covfefe?"

If they admit they fucked up, they look "weak" to their base, which expects "strong men." Normal human traits like empathy and humility are anathema to these creeps.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Feel like they're gonna throw Hegseth under the ~~bus~~ Cybertruck now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ten Bezos Bux says nothing will come of this.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

Do you want something to come out of this? I personally don't want Trump (or any other US president) having an efficient war machine.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump has already written it off saying “Waltz learned his lesson.”

So now we get to see if anyone is actually willing to stand up to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why not hire someone who isn’t learning their lessons as they go? You know, someone with experience?

👊🇺🇸🔥

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Who CARES? They will LIVE and LEARN! Unlike HER EMAILS!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What happened with her emails? HRC was prosecuted or something? Or did they just do nothing then too?

The state almost never punishes itself.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Turns out she was innocent. She didn't follow the protocol for classified documents. However the documents were not classified until after they were sent. She didn't break the law.

It didn't stop them though. Something must've been in those documents because they got buried in bureaucracy in following lawsuits.

In June 2016, in response to the Republican National Committee's complaints filed in March 2016, the State Department estimates it will take 75 years to complete the review of documents which are responsive to the complaints. It has been observed that a delay of this nature would cause the documents to remain out of public view longer than the vast majority of classified documents which must be declassified after 25 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

What about "Fast And Furious?"

The take there was that the President is personally responsible for any action taken by any subordinate.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My favorite quote is the one where he says it could leak lol

"...If this leaks we look indecisive"

Try incompetent beyond reason. This clown world is funny if people weren't dying.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Also this:

Pete Hegseth, after broadly describing the big picture situation/rationale for the strike, that same block of text you pulled the 'we look indecisive' from:

But, we can easily pause. And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSEC.

... I don't even know what to say.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

They shouldn't be doing any of that on Signal anyway.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is beyond bat shit nutz. We gotta throw these idiots in prison NOW. There’s so much more in those texts and 3 times more people involved. Also these dumb fucks lied under oath yesterday! Can’t be trusted, way under qualified and they’re territorial to this country. What happened to “common sense”? Always fucking Opposite Day with these clowns. Throw them in prison!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Ideally, yes, you're right. But... gestures broadly at United States judiciary it doesn't seem likely, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Given that these are military-related crimes, would it not be the courts-martial that should be arresting and prosecuting them rather than the regular judiciary? I'm not American and I'm not sure how it works over there, but I did watch "A Few Good Men"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Time to start bringing the fight to them. https://www.mobilize.us/ Online voice doesn’t go as far. Start protesting.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›