People say Qt sucks. But there is literally no better alternative to the KDE environment. Either Dolphin or tons of other apps just have more features and settings compared to GTK ones.
Unsure if they have the same issue
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
214 points (95.7% liked)
Linux
52696 readers
509 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I went and checked out Thunar because of this post, and regardless of the original intention, I have found a file manager I much prefer as a result. Thank you.
Good to know, even though I'm not a Gnome user. I wonder if it will work with torsocks.
Oh no! Anyways ...
Does KDE's Dolphin suffer from this, too?
Use the image viewer used by TAILS
Still not worse than the simple act of having to use gnome for longer than it takes to install something, anything else
OpenSnitch, do your thing!
Good thing I use the Flatpak version of Sushi, I’ll just remove the network permission.
Thunar is a much better alternative, in my opinion.
Pcmanfm? Nemo? However, if one does not need a GUI I would suggest ranger, nnn or alike.
When in doubt, avoid anything gnome.
I always install thunar into my gnome.
Agreed. I fucking hate Nautilus - especially the way it fucking tries to filter everything instead of jumping me to where I'm typing. It makes navigation so much slower
I hate, when programs like Firefox or anything else uses something like Nautilus to pick the file.
I can't even press ctrl+L to change the URL of my filesystem where I want to be. I need a lot of clicky GUI to get to the desination...
Thanks for tipping the previewer's name. Not concerned with the (valid) sec aspect personally, but I've accidentally hit space a couple of times since meta+shift+space is Sway's default for floating / tiling a window and I don't use the preview anyway. Let's uninstall.
It probably downloads remote images in PDFs too, but I don’t know that for sure.
While good for privacy, this sounds like an awful UX change for the average person. Some sort of nice toggle to disable it would be good, but removing it all together would probably annoy more people than it benefits.
Woah there! This is GNOME. You don't get choices.
Maybe we will get an extension
A setting that pulls information from the clear net should be up to the user and not a default setting, IMO.
It could be implemented the same as most email clients do. A simple message "load external content" with an option to always load.
Thanks for the tip! Despite never actually using sushi, I had it installed so now I've uninstalled it to avoid using it by accident.
It’s actually pretty nice in some situations.
One thing that bites me about Loupe / Image Viewer is that it always goes through images in alphabetical order, despite the sort option you have set in nautilus.
Sushi does go through items using the same sort option set in nautilus.
Though it can be finicky with videos, so I don’t use it for that.
Well its also a simple browser so it will preview the HTML page like any other browser would. But I don't know about audio files though.
IMO a "simple browser" of this sort should display literally only the content in the HTML file itself. It shouldn't even view CSS stored in a separate local CSS file, let alone reach out to the web to download more content.
Yes but an HTML file is very different from a website. At the very least I'd like an option to disable all remote requests, or disable previews for certain file formats.