this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
244 points (98.8% liked)

Games

37551 readers
1239 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Has there even been a Civ release that was great at the start? I had the old Civ 2 "Multiplayer Gold Edition," which my friend, who had the original, said had a much better AI. Give it a little while and see what they can do to make Civ 7 better, then it'll sell well.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No ghandi = fuck you.

You know they're going to bring him back as DLC

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Our words are backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As the article says, it's history repeating itself. This one made more foundational changes to the formula than 6 did over 5, and once again, if you're looking to play a Civ game, the old game is still going to be cheaper. I loved 6 when it came out, but when friends were curious about dipping their toes in, I just referred them to 5 because it was almost as good and far cheaper to try out. Civ 6 charts compared to 5 around the same time period are similar. I haven't picked up 7 yet just because I'm still trying to get through other games, but I'm looking forward to it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

I just referred them to 5 because it was almost as good

Why do you consider Civ 6 better than 5?

Edit for anyone else wanting to answer: Please specify whether you're including Brave New World (or Gods and Kings) in your comparison, since those expansions significantly improved upon the original Civ 5 release.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

On a technical level, it functioned better. On an artistic level, I liked the look a lot better. On a gameplay level, they were pretty similar, but I liked what they did with city tiles in 6.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›