GenZedong

4462 readers

20 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why was France able to revert fairly quickly back into a dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie after the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy while the soviet union hasn't been able to do the same? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(Obviously I mean a restoration of a proletarian dictatorship in the case of the USSR/former constituent states)

Just from what I can quickly gleam from my limited knowledge of the reign of Louis XVIII and Charles X it sounds decently similar to what occured with post soviet russia.

counter revolutionary ruler is incompetent and authoritarian

conflict between reactionary ruler and progressive legislature

reactionary ruler rigs elections and gets involved in foreign wars

reactionary ruler dissolves progressive legislature and appoints their own loyalist legislature

But why was it that the French restored the Bourgeois dictatorship under the citizen king but the Russians and other post soviet states (save for Belarus if you follow the same line of thinking of Cheng Enfu) were unable to? Was it size? Foreign interference?

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am no expert. I will though quote a Chinese comrade i spoke with about this.

"The USSR's revolution was incomplete."

This was in reference to how they had reactionaries inside the government. Contrary to how it is portrayed the USSR was lenient in a lot of ways. It gave far too much room for liberals to exist. Especially after Stalin died. Although even he was a lot nicer to them than he should have been honestly. This was done with good intentions of course. Not wanting to be too strict. It was still a mistake.

Putin was a KGB agent. Does he seem like someone who should have been trusted with a position like that? These were the cracks exploited to bring down the USSR. It was the first socialist project it didn't have hindsight like we do. It did a lot of amazing things, but it had so many enemies. The fact is survived as long and accomplished as much as it did is astounding.

In short, the USSR fell slowly, death by 1000 cuts.

But the USSR's legacy persists despite is dissolution. The spectre of communism hangs not over Europe, but over the world. The torch has been passed, and the fight continues.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Oh i should also mention the 1991 august coup. They did try to take power back. The issue was that at that point outside of a full blown civil war it wasn't going to happen. I imagine Yanayev recognized this, and decided against it. Especially since he was lacking in popular support from what I've read. Should they have pushed the issue? Fully committed? Maybe. Its not an easy decision to make.