this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
1314 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11197 readers
1276 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I agree but I think that car hoods should be higher. If you're hit by one of these you'll die slowly of organ pulverization. It'd be better to be hit in the head and die quickly of head pulverization. It's just that the poor truck cannot reach that high so it needs to be BIGGER. Maybe stick some spikes on there too, and have an optional extended package for saw blades!

(/s in case it wasn't apparent)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My redneck ranch family has run over so. Many. Of their own dogs

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Pretty sure it is, here.

Btw, what model is it?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Queue Vanellope Von Schweetz

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

They raised it aftermarket

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The headlights are at exactly the height to blind everyone who isn't also in a truck as well. I'm convinced that auto manufacturers do this on purpose to force everyone into a size arms race.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This was an aftermarket raise, so not really the responsibility of the manufacturer in this specific case

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it should be on the state for letting this thing pass basic safety inspection.

Shit like this shouldn't be street legal.

Perfect case in point....this truck is parked on the street. If that spot is the last spot before a parking lot entrance, there is no way for people turning out of that parking lot to see if it's clear or not. It's a hail-mary every fucking time. There was one of these parked in such a spot outside my kids daycare every single day last year.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Add in the amount of times I've seen people drive cars where their seat height puts their eyes at about 2 inches over the steering wheel.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

I've known a few truck drivers like that, with the air seat almost as low as it can go. The only thing they'd even be capable of seeing is an air strike.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago

Disgusting cars, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 232 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

There's diagrams that show the visual impairments such trucks have. They are worse than semi trucks and even an Abrams tank.

https://i.redd.it/kftiwovba73b1.jpg

[–] [email protected] 126 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

I don't get how these people even feel comfortable driving something where you can't see the road that's in front of you for 10+ meters out. I just wouldn't feel safe, there could be any kind of obstruction you can't see on the road from 10m away but will still fuck up your day and/or life.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 weeks ago

They don't look or care. Their car is big enough that they'll plough right through a bunch of kids before they even notice they're on the sidewalk.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

They don’t care, as long as they get to drive their behemoth and feel powerful.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago

It’s simple uneducated hubris. Nothing bad could ever happen to them because they are a Good American.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Looking at those dumbfucks driving their emotional support vehicle in the city, they don't seem to be comfortable

They are driving slow and can't stay in their lane, as they can't judge the distances correctly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

As a truck driver I get it. It's nice to see more. The tradeoff isn't worth it and not why they do it. I would bet my paycheck they never take it off road either. Which would be the only good reason to raise something that much. Truckers have a good reason to. They have giant engine and transmissions that need to last for the industrial work involved.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

cabovers are almost exclusively used throughout europe and asia. it's only america and australia that tends to use the big bonnet american style trucks.

there no real reason for it

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

A lot of trucking is long-range. America is fucking big and not everywhere is served by ports, railroads, and tributaries.

Those roof-scoops and curvaceous hoods aren't just for being sexy. They greatly increase aerodynamics and with it, range.

The important thing is that it requires specialized training and a license to drive something with such poor visibility. The pickups, any 16yo kid can legally drive.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think there is a legal reason for no cabovers in the USA. Maybe something based on crash safety (for just the occupants of course).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

There is a reason in Australia, the distances travelled and the enormous loads they haul require far more powerful trucks. Look up road trains. They are significantly more efficient than using multiple trucks.

Trains would be more efficient but Australia is too large and too sparsely populated to do everything with trains.

They are also safer for the driver than the Cab over style.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Power is not the issue. Cabovers can have just as much power as long-hood tractors.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

To be fair the regulations on vehicle length and older infrastructure makes the cabover popular.

American style trucks(long nose) get better mileage on longer hauls than the blunt nose design. They also provide more cabin room. As a final note American audiences are conditioned for the long nose design and it's difficult to find the imports here.

Having driven both I think they both have merit. In Europe an American truck would be impossible to maneuver in towns.

So that's the "real reason for it".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Agreed, but some people drive that way. It's their road, get out of the way. I had a 1996 Dodge dually long ago for pulling a trailer, and its visibility wasn't very bad, except for around the damn side columns. I got into the habit of leaning forward and back as I would turn so that I had some idea of what was being blocked. At one point we had considered upgrading to the big trucks like the F-450/F550, and I got into one to see what it was like. I could see EVERYTHING. I was like, holy shit, this is luxury.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

This attitude is really prevalent here. As in you don't really need to see the road, just the car in front.

People scream blue bloody murder about bikes on the road.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Side columns like that should be illegal. I was driving my stepdad's '21 Silverado 1500 crew cab a few weeks ago and was totally blown away when I almost pulled out in front of someone coming from the right in a big ass truck.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 111 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Should require a CDL to drive something that big. It's a bus sized front end.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

most of the buses in the next town over from me are f-350 and e-350s, so quite literally yes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Busses that size often don't require CDLs, definitely don't require a CDL B. A true bus is much, much bigger than a 350 (source, I drive a bus). An E350 has a GVWR of around 4-5 tons. I drive busses with GVWRs of 16-27 tons. (Their visibility is much, much better than this because the engine is in the back like basically all full busses)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't reconcile the exterior with interior pictures. From the outside it looks like the inside of that truck should be the size of a large sitting room with a Chesterfield and some end tables.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gotta cram the plastic shit and uselss tech in there somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Cupholders! Gotta have more cupholders.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›