Can anyone ELI5 why it's bad? Apart from contributior being Microsoft
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
6776 readers
167 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
did we arrive at the second stage of embrace, extend, extinguish?
No, Microsoft would likely sooner fully adopt the Linux kernel tbh.
It aligns with their software/service as a service model.
My bet is you’ll see a “windows 11” compatible user space running on Linux a la WSL ( LSW? ) in the coming decade.
I know Linux engineers who moved to Microsoft generally for this purpose
that's how the "extinguish" phase start - integrate it closely into your own product, so people use yours instead
it's a trap
Oh geeze, that format drives me nuts. Is there a tldr?
This adds the Hornet Linux Security Module which provides signature
verification of eBPF programs.
Amigo, it's 5 paragraphs and two of those are a quote.
Oh, there's two different links, the kernel lore one is the one I was complaining about.
Oh, I didn't think to check. Figured they were the same. But yeah, looking at it now it looks rather horrible, doesn't it?
Every Microsoft idea is always bad for Linux.
How about no? The whole proposal looks shady. Where Microsoft says "trust", I do not.
Very interesting. I'm sure it will find some consumers for this code, in systems that use codesign.
I dunno about this one chief; call it Microsoft paranoia.
One of the better security modules in the kernel was developed by the NSA.
It’s open source software and Microsoft can’t force it in, the open source model will handle this properly.
Okay well, It wouldn't have been the first code blob in the kernel (looking at you HDMI)