this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
1164 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

44966 readers
468 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I gotta be honest, when I look at the problem pragmatically, it'll be a lot easier to pay $20 a year than to switch to jellyfin and get all my users to figure out how to install clients and make it work for them.

I'm already at the point in my life where my primary concern is making things work smoothly, and if I need to throw money at something to make it work smoothly, the choice is a no brainer. (At least for some values of "money")

[–] ByGourou@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Jellyfin works in the browser just like Plex.

And for now you can do that, but that's not the first, and not the last update trying to prevent people selling access to their server.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I absolutely love that Emby is such a third thought that they don’t even get a mention anymore. They fucked their loyal users over so much that they don’t even get mentioned anymore. Can’t wait for plex to suffer the same fate

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Yes, I used to respond ever plex user try emby/jellyfin, not really knowing the difference

Looked into it and, it's going to turn out like plex again! Fuck them! Jellyfin all the way.

This always ends up happenning when you choose non copyleft software

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I just want to make sure I read this correctly. It says that if you're a Plex plass holder already that remote streaming changes won't affect your service. This means that if I have the lifetime subscription and host my own server than users whom have not payed for Plex pass can continue to access this server without issue correct?

[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (2 children)

How to kill a service speedrun any%

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] StThicket@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago (6 children)

If only jellyfin had an app on Tizen, I'd be all aboard.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Uncut_Lemon@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I stopped using Plex shortly after they started forcing logging in with your online Plex account to connect to LAN only based server. The writing was on the wall all those years ago. Who wants to be locked out of their media when the internet is offline, completely defeated the point of self hosting local infrastructure

Jellyfin, while lacking a bit when I first migrated, has continued improved over the years and it has been joyful to use. Plus Jellyfin supported hardware transcoding before Plex did, which was a gripe I had with Plex at the time.

I stream from my server remotely and share with Family without hassle. I dunno where Plex is trying to go, glad I bailed long ago

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm seeing a lot of negativity but I think they offer a great service and deserve to be paid for their work. I bought a lifetime pass many years ago and I almost feel guilty how much value I have received over that time.

[–] Uncut_Lemon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You need an internet connection to connect to a offline LAN Plex server... Just so unessessery, otherwise it doesn't find your server (I was quite confused on that one, when that started happening) Plus having to pay for multiple user accounts, all just seemed like it was heading towards user extortion. It also lacked hardware transcoding at that point in time, which isn't a huge issue, but did make it harder to run if you had a client that didn't support a specific codec.

While jellyfin requires zero internet to be functional and login, supported hardware transcoding before plex and has multiple user accounts usage out of the box, at zero cost.

[–] remon@ani.social 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You need an internet connection to connect to a offline LAN Plex server

Not true.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] professionalvirgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

ur getting what u paid for, why the guilt

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 39 points 5 days ago

This is the best ad campaign Jellyfin could have asked for.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why do people use this when Jellyfin exists?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I took a dive into linux and jellyfin and im too stupid for it.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Because of the Wife Factor. Getting people to convert requires getting past a lot of social inertia. It requires you to first convince them that the convenience of streaming services isn’t actually worth paying for. Then it requires an elegant onboarding experience. Lastly, Plex simply makes remote access easy. Sure, you could fiddle with reverse proxies for Jellyfin. But that’s easy to mess up. Instead, it’s much smoother to simply sign into Plex.

I can talk my tech-illiterate “My google chrome desktop icon got moved, and now I don’t know how to check my email” mother-in-law through Plex’s sign-up process over the phone. In fact, I did. It’s familiar enough that anyone who has signed up for a streaming service can figure it out. I can’t do that with Jellyfin, because their eyes glaze over as soon as you start talking about custom server URLs or IP addresses. Hell, my MIL’s TV doesn’t even have a native Jellyfin app available on the App Store. If I wanted to install it for her, I would need to sideload it.

Jellyfin does a lot of things right. But by design, the setup process will never be as elegant as Plex’s, because that elegant system requires a centralized server to actually handle it. And centralized servers are exactly what Jellyfin was built to rebel against.

To be clear, I run both concurrently; Jellyfin for myself, and Plex for friends/family. I got the lifetime Plex Pass license a decade ago, and it has more than paid for itself since then. But it sounds like a bunch of my friends and family may end up switching to Jellyfin if they don’t want to deal with the PlexPass subscription.

[–] Picasso@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

I think its a great idea to run the two concurrently. I didn’t see the point but given how plex is evolving i think its time to start getting familiar with jellyfin.

[–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Setting jellyfin up is for the technically inclined, i'll agree there, but once deployed I don't really see where Plex fundamentally excels over Jellyfin when it comes to "the wife factor"?

You open the app, app shows library, you click on desired media item, desired media item plays. What am i missing?

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The app isn't available on as many platforms. The original comment claimed the TV their MIL uses doesn't have a Jellyfin app and would require side loading. I would argue that's a pretty big barrier for most people.

[–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So far I've had no problems using jellyfin on basicly anything that exists in my house which includes a Apple TV, Xbox SX and a Xiaomi TV Box S.

But I can see there's probably no Tizen app for things like Samsung TV's.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's the setup which doesn't pass the "wife" test. The more setup friction, the lower the likelihood that average users will bother. It requires a very easy setup experience to retain the average user. Even us technical people have limited time in the day. If I get a similar experience out of both Plex and Jellyfin, I'm going with the software which is easier to set up. Most of us are at that point in our lives where we'll pay for convenience.

[–] Polderviking@feddit.nl -4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So lazyness is the real answer. ;) This is fair enough, to be sure, but logically I continue to have problems with it when looking solely at the wife factor.

My wife sets nothing up, that's my area of expertise. My wife's a user. This is true for Jellyfin but also things like our home automation that she very much enjoys but has no clue to how I made work on a technical level. She just taps things in the Home Assistant app as desired and things happen.

I would also argue setting up Jellyfin, though more a complex proposition as Plex, is a lot easier then setting up things like an *arr strack or ripping the media you eventually play back with it.

Plex does very little in a vacuum so despite it being easier to set up, it would be equally unlikely she ever would.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zer0bitz@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

I still remember sticking files on an apache server and openly sharing that with friends. Not had a need to do that lately but I can always start doing it again if necessary.

[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

The audacity of this company to increase prices when:

A) downloads are locked behind the paywall but havent worked in years (probably close to a decade at this point)

B) they focus all the development time on bringing bullshit to the platform (live tv, rentals, other streaming app searches, etc)

Requiring a subscription for remote access is actually fucking insane, they don't have any bandwidth costs associated with that other than authentication so ???

This will drive people to Jellyfin, and watch how fast Plex drops into irrelevance when all the selfhosters move away. Plex is (now was) the #1 thing to that both myself and others in this community would recommend to someone looking to get into selfhosting. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ not anymore, wonder how much the revenue will drop?

[–] TK420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I could only get my downloads to work adding some conf line to my unbound DNS settings I saw on reddit.

Jellyfin is on my list.

Final thought: there's also a fair chance (I'd rate it at almost 70%) that they presented this to us because they knew it would piss people off. Then, in a week or so, they will post a "we're sorry, is this better?" with the changes they're ACTUALLY going to make. A ploy to make us blindly agree to whatever they want because "at least it's better than what they wanted originally" 🙄🙄

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments