Capitalism breeds innovation
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
337 points (96.4% liked)
Technology
67535 readers
4920 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The fuck
I'm going to say that these degenerates need to be publicly humiliated and banned from ever owning or using any computing device ever again.
Jesus fucking Christ
I don't think he is watching. Clearly no one is moderating earth atm.
"I do not actually have don’t syndrome.”
LMAO please stop it, please .... :-)))
I was still surprised... We live in a world that has "rule 34" and yet I was still surprised to read that...
Hmm... Who da FAQ is following this genre...
I guess in the world where pedos exist as daily thing this ain't really surprising
it showed up on my reels a few days ago i couldn't believe it
Well you can always count on algo to deal you some fucking wierd slop
Also, this account is tagged as a bot. Are you Russian?
load more comments
(1 replies)
So much win in just a title!
That headline is a brand new sentence for sure.
And I thought that Shrimp Jesus was bad already.
Not even shrimp Jesus can save us from this one
load more comments
(1 replies)
That's not a combination of words I expected to see today.
Difficult to know what even to say about this. It might be legal? But it is a deep violation of the social contract.
I love how there's that one weirdo downvoting all these replies against the multitude of people who find this distasteful. You know who you are, you twisted little wretch.
It’s going to be some form of IP infringement.
It's promoting the fetishization of already deeply marginalized and possibly easily exploited people due to their genetics.
This is going to create a subclass of gooners who want to groom and exploit the mentally handicapped in real life which is definitely illegal.
Either it's "violent videogames don't create serial killers" or "disabled porn causes disabled fetishes"
You can't have both old man.
While I do wholeheartedly agree that promoting fetishization of marginalized people who are vulnerable is despicable, evil, and just about any other pejorative you can think of--but it's a thought crime.
It's not illegal to create digital art (even the disgusting kind) which depicts fictitious grown adults doing grown adult things.
I would argue that if any such subclass of degenerate could exist, then they already do exist. You're not creating this subclass and any claim of expansion of such a subclass would be anecdotal at best and bullshit at worst. If they're out there they're out there. It's a chicken and egg problem. Which came first, the pornography or the degenerate?
We have a constitutionally protected right in this country to freedom of expression and that right cannot be infringed simply because you believe that it could lead to more people being taken advantage of. The right to that expression must be protected regardless of how repugnant you believe the resultant actions are. As history is shown any number of times the restriction of any right is a slippery slope in any capacity. There's a quote by Noam Chomsky which is particularly relevant here;
If you believe in freedom of speech, you believe in freedom of speech for views you don't like. Goebbels was in favor of freedom of speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you're in favor of freedom of speech, that means you're in favor of freedom of speech precisely for views you despise.
As a society we need to strongly condemn these actions, and we need to ensure that the most vulnerable among us are absolutely protected. But as soon as you start making thought crimes illegal you open the door to any number of machinations. How long before the extreme right use that precedent to start prosecuting individuals for other thought crimes? I would bet my last dollar it wouldn't take very long...
load more comments
(8 replies)
You're probably right, but this feels an awful lot like a 'violence in video games will lead to violence in real life' argument.
While I don't disagree with you, what if the violence in the game in question was specifically against people with Down's Syndrome? I think that may bring it a little closer to being equal - in terms of the analogy, anyway. I don't think the big problem here is the AI porn necessarily, so much as the fetishization of not just a minority, but one with an impairment. (Which I think is only further compounded by said impairment being largely cognitive/developmental in nature, as well.)
load more comments
(4 replies)
What a fucked up day to be literate.
If it's illegal as fuck I'm going to be so relieved. It's so distractingly horrible that I can't even think clearly
It's not illegal to take advantage of amputees, but it's definitely illegal to groom and have sex with the mentally disabled, who are classified similarly to children.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Exploitation machines go BBBRRRRRRRRRRRR
what a brave new world we live in
Eeewwwwwwwww..........