this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
656 points (99.5% liked)

politics

21975 readers
4169 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump fired FTC Commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, the agency’s only Democrats, prompting accusations of illegal action.

Both cited Supreme Court precedent protecting FTC commissioners from dismissal without cause. Bedoya warned Trump wants the FTC to serve corporate interests, while Slaughter said the administration fears accountability.

The 1935 Supreme Court ruling bars presidents from removing FTC commissioners arbitrarily.

Critics say the move undermines regulatory independence and eliminates opposition voices that could challenge Trump’s policies favoring major corporations.

(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 134 points 12 hours ago (7 children)

Biden: "I can't fire a postmaster general who actively tried to sabotage the election against me in 2020 because it would be against the law."

Trump: " I fired someone who SCOTUS directly said i can't fire because some people openly bribed me"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

“Illegally fired” means you rolled over and resigned in response to a threat

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

Oh, I get to say it this time. A dog can't play basketball!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like if a democrat did something like this fox news et al would be screaming screaming screaming and there would be violent riots. Why is everyone else so docile?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Woke: Get illegally fired and act like you were fired illegally. Keep going to work. Let security block your entry. Argue that you still work there because the order to fire you was illegal. When you're arrested, take the matter to court and get legal standing on the fact that your firing was illegal.

Broke: Get illegally fired and whine on social media about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Do what a Trump official would do, refuse to leave. What are they going to do?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Earlier today, the DC police forcibly removed the employees of an independent agency after the employees called said police to get the illegal attempted-invaders removed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

administration fears accountability

Pfffft. That is so fucking bullshit. No they don't. They don't fear accountability or responsibility. This administration is lead by a 34-count convicted felon/rapist, a two-time impeached, failed businessman of a crook. What the fuck does he have to lose in terms of credibility that makes him think twice of the actions he's done?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago

Sure he fears accountability, all profligates do especially when that accountability comes in the form of extreme violence. Ooh maybe we can give out loto tickets to decide who lives or dies, only two get to live one though one will get their legs crippled. Truly I need to stop playing New Vegas

[–] [email protected] 31 points 16 hours ago (10 children)

He straight up admitted on air that the election was rigged, and there hasn't been a peep from anyone

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago

And what did Harris and the Dems do? Nothing.

What did Trump do in 2021? Cause an insurrection.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I had literally not heard of this so looked up the video. Fucking wild, man!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

He even praises Elon over it...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'd seen that one and I understand how he could be referring to the Dems as "them" but the FIFA/Olympics one is more damning imo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. "They rigged the election and now I'm president again."

So fucking nonchalantly too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 17 hours ago

Just illegal, fascist things.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Dems are just going to sit there with frowny faces, say bold things but take it up the ass.

[–] [email protected] 137 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Most blatantly and openly venal miserable and horrible attempt at an "administration" in the last 60yrs... Likely in US history.

Helluva legacy for you Chump! Good one!

🙄 🙄 🖕 🖕 🖕

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

The fact that approval ratings for Trump are still as high as they are while the approval for the only other far, far, far lesser evil you can vote, the Democrats, is sinking, does not give me any hope whatsoever for the US, were I naive enough to believe that the next elections that matter could come soon enough or that they would still remain legitimate. The US no longer has a trace of Democracy except for the mask it wears, it is at the same or even lower level than Russia's.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

All that he's missing is a war America is involved in, not related to the trade tariffs. We'll find out which country he wants to go to war with soon.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Canada, Greenland or Panama. He's still deciding. Give him time it's been a busy two months!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if it were Central America, first. They already lack strong governments and global positioning. Especially with the cartels actively holding back progress.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That is one of my more annoying thoughts. In his child-like rampaging through the most powerful office in the world, he might accidentally do something good like wipe out the cartels or give support to a country that really needs it on the global scale. The cost will be extremely high. Like through the twisted Nazi experiments, we ended up learning a ton about mental health and brain responses that... Well, it's probably the only way to discover some of those things. But the methodology is unthinkable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

He may have some success in beating the cartels back, somewhat. But overall he's not going to support any country down there, he's going to send the military to bomb the fuck out of what little infrastructure they have, cause large amounts of collateral damage and death, and seize whatever is of value. We've already seen this playbook in the middle east.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

I didn't really do a good job in my comment. I meant fostering support by others, just like Ukraine. Against his whatever crazy agenda. But I totally agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, Panama also side steps the NATO problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›