this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
903 points (99.5% liked)

Games

36636 readers
968 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While I agree that some of the reasons are because of industry direction and affordability. I do have to mention also that it could also be because of nostalgia, familiarity, simplicity and people still chipping at their library.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I have been playing Galaga regularly since 1981. Still play it at least once a week.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Me a fraction of a fraction of the gamer community playing only recent PCVR games and also Noita.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I have hundreds of games on steam.

I mostly play minecraft.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My games library is so huge, and I suffer from choice paralysis all the time.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You might get some use out of this Steam randomizer, I've used it before when I can't pick what to play. You can apply filters too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

⭐w⭐ Thanks!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

I have a large backlog of five(?)+ plus year old games that are really good and I have yet to play. I'd much rather burn through those enjoying them on high settings instead of playing current games on low settings while trying to dodge crap monetization.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

92% of my playtime is Minecraft, makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 155 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

7.1% of the total hours spent were on Counter-Strike: Global Offensive / Counter-Strike 2
6.4% were in League of Legends
6.2% were in Roblox
5.8% were in Dota 2
5.4% were in Fortnite

That is a lot of people playing free-to-play competitive multiplayer games.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I read every one of those and thought. Well that's a new game. Apparently I'm old.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Its the replayability. I mean, look how many people are still playing chess. Stick a human intelligence on the other end of the stick and you've pretty much got it figured out.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Free is an important reason why. Also, these games run very well on old machines. If you mostly play that and get a new rig, you don't have to spend a lot. Pc parts have gotten ridiculously expensive.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I get free reducing the barrier-to-entry, but I kinda look at games in terms of "how much is the ratio of the cost to how many hours of fun gameplay that I get?"

I mean, I have some games that I briefly try, dislike, and never play again. Those are pretty expensive, almost regardless of the purchase price.

But the thing is, if it's a game that you play a lot, the purchase price becomes almost irrelevant in cost-per-hour of gameplay. I've played Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead


well, okay, you can download that for free, but I also bought it on Steam to throw the developers some money


and Caves of Qud a ton. The price on them is basically a rounding error. And the same is probably true for the top few games in my game library.

You could charge me probably $2000 for Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead, and it'd still be cheaper per hour of gameplay than nearly all games that I've played, because I've spent so many hours in the thing.

If people are playing these like crazy, you'd think that the same would hold for them. That the cost for a game that you play like crazy for many years just...doesn't matter all that much, because the difference in hours played between games is so huge that it overwhelms the difference in price.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'm old enough to have bought TF2. Played a little less than a thousand hours. Even counting a few in-game purchases, the cost per hour is very low.

But free means no barrier, you can join anytime,m and stay if you like it. Your friends can try it out too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Free means you can easily get any friends to dip in and play which is a big factor.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmm. That's a thought. I guess that that'd mesh with them also all being multiplayer.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also big up for Cataclysm: DDA. One of the greatest games ever made.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

It has one of the harshest learning curves out there, but yeah, it's very replayable and has pretty extensive game mechanics.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Was just now in another thread having nostalgia about this game: Reamlz.

It was distributed as freeware/ shareware back in the 90's. You had to physically mail the producers cash if you wanted to get the expansions. I played through Balders Gate III recently and honestly, it doesn't even come close to the replayability that Realmz had.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Curious what makes Realmz so replayable. BG3 has so many unique storylines and endings you’d be hard pressed to play them all. Not to mention character classes and subclasses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Never played it, but this type of game is up my alley. For what it's worth:

https://www.gog.com/dreamlist/game/realmz-1994

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Realmz was out about the same time as Spiderweb Software's games (Exile series, later re-released as Avernum series). Both were popular RPGs for the Macintosh (though I believe both had Windows releases as well).

While I did play and enjoy Realmz back in the day, I personally preferred the Spiderweb Software games. More complicated interaction with the world, and I preferred the writing. Less-pretty, though the Avernum re-release was isometric and had new graphics. Have you ever tried them?

I don't know if I can recommend them in 2025, but if you're still enjoying Realmz, I figure that the Spiderweb Software stuff might also be something of interest.

EDIT: The current Steam sale, which runs for another two days, appears to have a bundle of all of their games on sale for 60% off. I didn't personally enjoy the Geneforge series as much as the Exile/Avernum series, and the Avadon series is considerably simpler, and didn't really grab me. But a lot of the games are also on sale individually, so...shrugs

EDIT2: It looks like Realmz has not seen a Steam release; thought I'd check to see if it was on Steam too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Me and my friends, we would play together by each getting a character and then taking turns during combat moving each of our characters.

I might buy that bundle on just your recommendation. I never tried those but if its vaguely like Realmz, I want to try it, since I pretty much only play on my steam deck these days.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a high bar to clear, but if you add it to the GOG Dreamlist, I'll vote for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks. I gave it a search before asking, and I didn't see it, but with the link you posted elsewhere, I just voted on it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, I'm sorry, I thought I just didn't like games/am depressed/games are getting BETTER, actually.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Games as a whole are getting better, but AAA is getting worse.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Are they getting worse overall or are we just comparing all of the current AAA games to the best AAA of the past few decades? Or comparing the current versions of series to the high points, which might just be the first game in the series?

We definitely have a number of high quality AAA games that come out each year. Most prior years had a few high quality AAA games and a lot of mediocre or terrible ones too. It's kind of like music where the average quality over time is actually pretty consistent, but in any given year there are a lot of turds and there are certain trends that are common to those turds.

90% of every entertainment medium tends to be terrible, but when we look back we mostly remember the 10% that were good and only a few of the absolute worst to laugh at.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago

Indies are so good right now, and most without crazy DRM!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In general, I'd agree that games are getting better, if for no other reason that there are so many made these days that eventually you'll find something great.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

If nothing else, the total volume of great games that are available to play keeps increasing because of massive improvements in backwards compatibility through steam and other online game distributors.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Currently 100% of my time is spent on games that are "six or more years old", and a lot of that is spent on games that are more than 30 years old. But! I'm playing newly-made community content for 30 y/o games. This kind of retrogaming is something that evades Steam statistics entirely because it usually means playing custom sourceports of old games which rarely are on Steam. One old game I play on Steam to contribute to this statistics is Skyrim.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For me, definitely older and indie (old and new). I don't get a lot of time these days to sit at my PC. Using my steam deck primarily these days is part of the reason I'm playing older games, but seriously I have a problem with steam/gog/name a storefront/ backlogs. I have so many games already, great time to review what I bought because of hype but never played.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah that whole conundrum, if you have the money to buy new games you don't have the time to play them, if you had the time, you wouldn't have the money to buy them.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›