UK Politics

3089 readers

48 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Lords pass five amendments to Rwanda bill in heavy defeat for Rishi Sunak (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rishi Sunak has suffered his heaviest defeat in the House of Lords after the archbishop of Canterbury and former Conservative ministers joined forces with the opposition to force through five amendments to the Rwandan deportation bill.

The string of government setbacks, most passed by unusually large margins of about 100 votes, means the legislation, which aims to clear the way to send asylum seekers on a one-way flight to Kigali, will have to go back to the Commons.

The prime minister has previously warned the unelected chamber against frustrating the “will of the people” by hampering the passage of his safety of Rwanda (asylum and immigration) bill, which has been approved by MPs.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The irony of an unelected prime minister threatening an unelected chamber is palpable.

Interesting that he knows it's the will of the people despite having no possible way of determining that. There hasn't been a referendum, there hasn't been an election with this on the manifesto, there has been multiple protests about it but apparently they don't count. Despite all the evidence, it is the will of the people.

Anyone who disagrees with the will of the people is not "the people", even if the majority of people disagree with "the will of the people". Interesting that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

We just have to put up with this until the GE and then the new Labour government will dripythis policy as one of the first things it will do. Keir has said as much already.... wait, I think he has 🤔? He has said he'll drop this policy, right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

That was last week, no one knows what U turns he will make next week, not even Sir Starmer himself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

He has consistently said he'll drop it. Even before the Supreme Court said it was illegal, he said he'd drop it regardless of its legality. Labour have voted against it at every reading.

Labour's plans for tackling immigration are actually more popular than the Tories', so it'd be pretty wild to turn around and support the scheme for electoral reasons.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

He was a barrister who spent most of his legal career working on human rights issues. My hope is that everything Kier says or does, that may suggest any similarity or alignment to Tory policy, is to minimise focus of right wing media and the last 20% of people who still support the current Tory establishment. Fingers crossed anyway.