this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
216 points (77.6% liked)

politics

21975 readers
4328 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sanders is one of the most popular politicians in the US, and his political analysis and messaging remain as relevant and compelling as ever. But while his Tour to Fight Oligarchy is inspiring and important, the broad left badly needs a political vision that goes beyond Sanders.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Almost like some sort of grassroots 3rd party that is literally too radical of an idea for you fools in this community who argued Biden (and Harris) was somehow more leftist than Obama.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, let's lose worse.

Without ranked choice voting, the only option is to fix it from within.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

RCV is not something the two party system would willingly allow to occur in enough states to matter, and it's not a base requirement for a 3rd party to succeed.

Pakistan doesn't have RCV, it took them 20 years which included a 10 year military dictatorship and 10 years of faked paper ballots and miscounts. No way the US would need more than that considering we don't have massive issues involving voter fraud.

I'm sick of people disregarding 3rd party with what is essentially a flawed argument of the two party system used to convince people 3rd parties are impossible.

You would be surprised at the amount of increased turnout from the nonvoters group that would gain wins in an FPTP system despite the disadvantage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The sit out centrists need to vote

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Bernie is the only leftist in the Senate. So until that changes it will be impossible to move beyond him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We need a progressive takeover of the democratic party. The MAGAs tranformed the republican party in what 10 years?

If we have midterms it has to start then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

*The Koch Brothers et al. used their vast wealth to transform the Republican Party in 10 years.

The biggest problem the left faces is that money is required for any political action in the U.S., and there is no money for the left. No billionaire will fund 50501, or Our Revolution, and in fact they'll gladly spend several million dollars defeating leftist primary challengers and suppressing news of protests.

Our political system is hopelessly rigged. There is no longer any way to use it to save ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

We have to organize at the community level and do it without all the shadowfunding the fascists have.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably won't happen. The DNC are conservatives and the majority of the US is too. Most ppl are too dumb/uninformed to see left leaning politics is what they actually want

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Which means there's no hope for this framework and the best thing that can happen is collapse and rebuild for even any long term hope for our descendants after a lot of pain.

I agree the people have been systematically made hostile to policies that would defend them the laborers from the capitalists by capitalist for profit media propaganda and capitalist captured government propaganda.

If the people are only willing to vote as "left" as the good cop fascist dems and it's a coin flip between them and the can't go any further right fascist Repubs, there is no solution short of letting entropy tear it all down.

You can't repair a sinking ship when the only solutions available are make more little holes(D) or make more big holes(R)in the hull. The people would need to at minimum have a stop making new holes (funneling all resources to the top 0.1%) party. But that's evil communist leninist Marxist socialism Herp derp! Better starve to death under a freeway 🇺🇸

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the language is funky. They're saying beyond, like take his ideas and go even further, not move away from Bernie. They want more and better of him.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Luigi, because Bernie was our compromise.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Reading the article, the argument is that Bernie isn't left enough, and more radical candidates need to be run in primaries.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A new party is needed. Be done with the garbage that we currently have

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, you think the same people who couldn't get past the DNC in 2016, 2020, and 2024 are suddenly going to be able to create a party in less than 24 months?

I'm not going to hold my breath

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Reinventing the wheel is a waste of time.

We need a massive voter registration drive. 90 million people didn't vote in 2014. Even 10% would be a game changer.

Primary every sitting Dem and force them Left. Make every GOP fight for every vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›