this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
529 points (98.7% liked)

News

29387 readers
3283 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would "prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being."

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines "non-human" behavior as "any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species," with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Surgical means‽

Also why are they legislating about this. Texas schools have real problems like gun violence and illiteracy. Furries and animal role play are just things some people have always done that don't really harm anyone and given how they persist across so many cultures and times could actually be considered a natural behavior of homo sapiens like parrots' mimicry

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

You could think that reality has no more pressing problems.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Furries are the ultimate dorks. I know I am very furry affiliated and most of my friends are furries... but this makes being a furry badass nyao.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So can’t dress as a Republican?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Does that forbid earrings as well? They're non-biological extensions/modifications of the human body.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Better yet. Simply wearing glasses?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No because earrings are not physiological.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

technically all clothing is illegal now?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What world do these people live in? I just can't imagine this is a issue and i imagine that passing a law like this will just lead to kids definitely shitting in litter boxes because breaking the law is fun, imagine the court case of a kid dressed like a cat and pissed in a box.. straight to jail

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Man they keep coming back to the litterbox thing, it really freaks them tf out. Even though its been debunked dozens of time, my conservative friends all swear they know a guy that knows a guy that swears he saw one for real!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would not be able to stop myself from laughing if i saw that happening for real but these people think of it as a threat to their existence, as a crime.

What a witless world we live in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Republicans are fucking weirdos.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

Sooooo much freeedommmm.... By limiting self expression.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Maybe the constitution of the United States of America says something about this? Maybe like the first thing in the bill of rights? Nah I must be mistaken.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That doesn't matter anymore

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Schools have to maintain a certain level of order and conformity to function as intended. Courts have already ruled as much. You can't engage in behavior which would prevent the system from working as intended e.g. walk around topless, yell profanities, play loud music, etc - things which you can obviously do in other public spaces. Wearing full body animal costumes or barking randomly, claiming its your identity, is just as ridiculous and just as disorderly.

With that said, schools probably already had the tools they needed to stop this, so I'm not sure why a law was needed. Unless there was actually some furry zealot fighting against a school board.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just had a read through the bill and, as written, it would prohibit elementary school children from playing pretend as animals on the school playground during recess. Obviously, if a student were using that as pretext to, like, bite someone, you'd want a supervisor stepping in, but to straight-up ban harmless elements of play-pretend like this is frankly asinine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

yeah ok but like schools can make policy. If someone is doing something thats an issue there's a dean for a reason.

Also, I don't think a headband with ears is really the biggest issue of our times right now. This is entirely useless and just for control. Same with banning books, there's already systems in place. Globally banning things -that AREN'T an issue- does not help anybody at all.

This is ONLY for erasure of demographics and control over the people. Starts with furries, then men in skirts, then anything queer at all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can’t engage in behavior which would prevent the system from working as intended

So, enforcing uniformity?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

To the degree necessary for education, absolutely.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I admit that I block the furry and all its sexual representation on fedi when I see it. It doesn't turn me on that much and feels weird. But that's the same feeling a woman or man would have towards a gay person of the same sex or similar of different gender. This is sexism at its core. WTF!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't turn me on that much

Just a lil' bit furry, check.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn’t turn me on that much

That much?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Not sexism, just bigotry. I'm not personally down with furries, as in its not my jam, but that doesn't mean i have any right to stop them being who they are. You wanna dress up in a big fur suit, have at'er. It literally doesn't affect me in anyway. I don't like it, so I won't participate in it, that's all.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Oh boy, the fascists have really done it now: they're going after the beastpeople! Beware its poisonous spittle!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

So a furry suit made from human hair is ok? Asking for a friend

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›