Whenever I see a vest that says POLICE ICE on it, I always think that whoever ordered them had a stutter.
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Since this is a private company, could the internet theoretically flood them with so many GDPR takedown requests (since they're undoubtedly getting data from foreign citizens) and takedown requests around California, Colorado, and other state's laws that they couldn't handle the influx and he gears would be gummed up to hell... in Minecraft?
Why... the two chess websites? That seems really random. I know chess has boomed within the past 5 years, but really? Both of them?
You must have missed the Bush era/Snowden era:
A new story published on the German site Tagesschau and followed up by BoingBoing and DasErste.de has uncovered some shocking details about who the NSA targets for surveillance including visitors to Linux Journal itself.
While that is troubling in itself, even more troubling to readers on this site is that linuxjournal.com has been flagged as a selector! DasErste.de has published the relevant XKEYSCORE source code, and if you look closely at the rule definitions, you will see linuxjournal.com/content/linux* listed alongside Tails and Tor. According to an article on DasErste.de, the NSA considers Linux Journal an "extremist forum". This means that merely looking for any Linux content on Linux Journal, not just content about anonymizing software or encryption, is considered suspicious and means your Internet traffic may be stored indefinitely.
One of the biggest questions these new revelations raise is why. Up until this point, I would imagine most Linux Journal readers had considered the NSA revelations as troubling but figured the NSA would never be interested in them personally. Now we know that just visiting this site makes you a target. While we may never know for sure what it is about Linux Journal in particular, the Boing Boing article speculates that it might be to separate out people on the Internet who know how to be private from those who don't so it can capture communications from everyone with privacy know-how. If that's true, it seems to go much further to target anyone with Linux know-how.
Let me reiterate this part: the NSA considers Linux Journal an "extremist forum".
I guess my interest in not wanting ads shoved down my throat or not wanting to deal with Microsoft anymore makes me an extremist.
The seeds for this were planted long ago.
It seems only fair that this contractor's method of income be known to their family, friends and community?
"Fediverse" is listed though. Does that include all of the federated services or just a few?
It also says "Dark Web." They might be trying to not tip their hand by mentioning specific sites or someone from Marketing wrote the list.
Good question. In a way, the Fedi is a bit like the Storm Area 51 flashmob joke: "they can't catch all of us!"
The diversified instances may make it harder to track every server and every individual.
This has been going for over a decade at the very least...
And yet the normie got nothing to hide.
God forbid he has to do something that's not jerking off social media all day
Sooo the party against a surveillance state creates a surveillance state. Am i getting this right?
This has nothing to do with the brain dead politics... This garden variety regime behavior that has been happening since at least patriot act
What would you like me to say, "Encourages the innovative surveillance state so long as it fits their agenda"?
which was signed into effect by which party again?
Pathetic level of critical thinking...
The next day, October 24, the Act passed the House by a vote of 357–66,[6] with Democrats comprising the overwhelming majority of "no"-votes. The three Republicans voting "no" were Robert Ney of Ohio, Butch Otter of Idaho, and Ron Paul of Texas. On October 25, the Act passed the Senate with a vote of 98–1. Russ Feingold (D-WI) voted "no".[7] On October 26, then US President George Bush signed the Patriot Act into law.
That was my point.
Correct, both parties worked together to make this happen ;)