this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
913 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23601 readers
2963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Avoiding constituents is peak cowardice—if you can't face voters, you shouldn't hold office.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago

This is good to highlight how the cons are hiding out from their constituents.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago

My Democratic rep has had two town halls, huge feisty crowds for both.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Great. Now the Democrats can have everything lined up to take over during the midterms and...change nothing.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Last time we had a filibuster proof majority was in 2009 for two different periods of two months each.

Essentially Republicans have either been in power or had enough power to stop Democrats for the entire voting lives of most people on this sub.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Last time we had a filibuster proof majority was in 2009 for two different periods of two months each.

Any time during which democrats possessed a simple majority, they could have done away with the filibuster forever. Stop making excuses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

….said the 90 million people that stayed home in November.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Implying we'll have a midterm

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I bet the Democrats are using the momentum to send a stern message. And the press will proudly feature articles of how the Democrats SLAMMED the white house!! And the White house will barely notice, and go on doing what they are doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

We need people telling at them, and we need people politely approaching them with the same policies.

A game of good constituent/bad constituent, if you will.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

People probably won't need to yell at them if the Democrats actually are listening to and engaging with the voters.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If democrats think that auction paddles are gonna solve this, they still need to be yelled at.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

If they engaged with their voters, we wouldn’t have any democratic representatives over age of 65. Anything past that is just posturing and self enrichment

Edit: wow I left a generally agreeable comment and fucked off for the day and apparently a lot of people want representatives older than 65? Yet no one can say why that’s a good thing they only bring up Bernie who’s an independent and not a democrat. Some of you don’t know what you want other than to shit on people online and it’s laughable

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So… Bernie Sanders is posturing and out of touch?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (11 children)

If they engaged with their voters, we wouldn’t have any democratic representatives over age of 65.

Bernie Sanders is not a democrat.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Cricket cricket

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

What's with the ageism? I want Democratic representatives of any age, as long as they have the right policies and they are of sound mind. People over the age of 65 will be just fine with me, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You gotta draw the line somewhere. Retirement age seems like as good a place as any.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Why do you have to draw the line somewhere?

I feel like a broken record here, but the huge uptick in ageism I see in relation to politics seems like it's not going to, ahem, age well given the amount of things I keep seeing about slowing down/reversing aging...

I mean, yeah, it sounds kind of silly until it doesn't. I remember reading about/thinking about things like AI (even if it's not AGI - things like LLMs are here and disrupting the shit out of things). Same with self-driving cars. And yeah, neither of these things are perfect, but they are having an effect on society - people I know mostly got very smug and dismissive about these notions just 20 years ago. They are rather quiet about them now. I think the same thing is true about aging. Even if the breakthroughs are extremely mild and stay that way for decades, maybe even forever, suppose average healthspan is increased even 5 years. That will make (upper) age limits look very myopic and dated.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

So you’d be fine with a child holding the role? After all why draw a line. Age relates to capability on both ends.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's not about how long you live so much as getting stuck in your ways. Old people don't learn new things and adapt the way young people do. Humans solidify the way they do things in their 20s, make some fine tuning in their 30s/40s, and then pretty much stick to those habits for the rest of their life. With the way technology is progressing we can't have stagnant people leading an evolving society.

There are exceptions to every rule but that doesn't mean statistics aren't valuable information to base decisions on. Do you want people stuck in the past making laws about the future?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Democrats do not listen to or engage with voters. The last time we told them to listen. their response was 'I'm speaking.'

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 143 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is the opportunity for democrats running in the mid-terms to start their own town halls.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Elected dems do hold town halls like this article talks about. If you are referring to dems not in office, they're starting to do stuff like that. For instance:

Rep. Tom Kean Jr. (R) refuses to hold a town hall in NJ-07. So next Thursday March 13 in Summit, NJ former Rep. Tom Malinowski will hold a town hall meeting to discuss the current moment and what citizens can do to protect democracy. RSVP link here (or use the QR code): https://forms.gle/RcSVhWpsrLCfT9w67

https://bsky.app/profile/njindivisible.bsky.social/post/3ljww6godzc23

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Bold of you to assume we’ll be allowed to have mid-terms

Edit: that’s just me being snarky. Keep fighting the good fight. Vote in every fucking election that you can, at every level you can - federal, state, and local (and, if you’re an investor, shareholder - that, I think, is an under emphasized vector here). Be an activist in every way you can, through every path available to you.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Elections are run at the state level including for federal offices. There have already been >48 state and local elections this year since January alone. Elections are way more than just the midterms and they are still happening. See https://ballotpedia.org/Elections_calendar

Normalizing the idea that elections wouldn’t happen is just playing directly into Trump and Musk’s hands

They want us to be so cynical we stop fighting back. They want us not to vote. They want us to not protest. They want us to not boycott. They want us too tired to fight

Don’t give in, we can still win these fights

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I’m not giving in. I was just being snarky. All I’m trying to do with comments like that is to get more people to take the situation more seriously. I know we’re not cooked yet, but the hot plate is getting pretty fucking toasty.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Comments like that unfortunately do the opposite - they make people defeatest which makes people stop paying attention to the situation at all

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair point.

I admit I’ve been feeling pretty fucking bleak about things lately. I also admit I sometimes use this space as a pressure-release valve for myself. It’s fair and correct to point out that the vibe I’m introducing is counterproductive. I shall try to do better. Cheers, friend.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wait, wait you can have productive discussions like this on the internet? (Thank you for being receptive - we need more people like you)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Same comment to both of you guys so you both see it. I can't say it made me happy, but this thread did make me feel a little bit better. Thanks for being a decent human, even if just for these few comments.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I’ve had a lot more interactions like this on lemmy since I joined a couple years ago than I ever had on Reddit. It’s one of the reasons I actually kinda like this place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Good faith discussions are a helluva drug.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Same comment to both of you guys so you both see it. I can't say it made me happy, but this thread did make me feel a little bit better. Thanks for being a decent human, even if just for these few comments.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@Sunshine Hopefully they will turn out as much at the voting booth

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Hopefully they'll have something worth turning out for. Let's see if you become hostile to the suggestion that democrats need to become better in order to appeal to voters.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›