this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
794 points (99.1% liked)

politics

21975 readers
4321 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON - Impeach Trump Again, a nonpartisan campaign led by Free Speech For People, announced today that they have collected over 250,000 petition signatures in support of an impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump. The announcement comes on the heels of Rep. Al Green’s recent House floor speech that he would bring articles of impeachment against the president.

“The Constitution has a remedy for a corrupt, lawless president: impeachment,” says John Bonifaz, President of Free Speech For People. “Donald Trump has already committed multiple abuses of power since assuming the Oval Office again, and he must be held accountable. More than 250,000 people across the country have now joined this call for impeachment proceedings against Trump. We urge all Americans who still believe in the Constitution and our democracy to join us at this critical moment in our nation's history. And, we urge Members of Congress to follow the mandate of their oath of office, stand with Congressman Al Green, and invoke the power of the Impeachment Clause to address the direct and serious threat Donald Trump poses to our Republic.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

The system does not work against those that simultaneously run the system and do not recognize the system

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because those previous impeachments really changed things...

For the millionth time, using the system to attempt to fix said system will never change a thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Last time, he was out of office, so it was a little gray. This time they don't have that excuse.

But they also aren't going to convince the Republicans to go along with it this time either, and even if they do, we're still stuck with Vance, another anti-democracy turd.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The first impeachment was December 2019. You're right, though. The system is stacked heavily in his favor right now, and getting Trump out isn't going to make everything magically better. Vance and Mike Johnston are next in line, which... isn't good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yes and no. They system is designed for sustainability. However it's been 3 elections since we had a chance of fixing it. We had a chance with Obama. But now they have the Supreme Court and gerrymandering. It's an uphill battle.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

We need this to be 25 million

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

And my axe!

I also signed the petition.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

0.07% of the american population against a senate and house fully in control by the Trump Party.

This is the kind of action that will get stuff done! Internet petitions that have almost never had any meaningful effects outside of literally millions of people signing petitions for extremely tiny issues that have no effect on anyone in power. That will change their minds!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Im sure your democracy is as strong as ever and will fend off this threat.

Fucking idiots.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They could have 1,000,000 signatures. The result will be always the same when the man you are trying to impeach personally owns the military.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you were in the military would you follow orders that are unconstitutional? Which is to say, an order that requires you to suppress the American people?

I would hope service people would see what is happening and say no. But that's a hope more than anything.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

UCMJ obliges members of the armed forces to not obey unlawful orders. Problem is they don't teach law when you're in, and some of this shit can get awfully complicated, and that's excepting the mountains of propaganda.

That's being said, we are fortunately not yet seeing the military of the US being used to suppress American citizens. But maybe tomorrow!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Phew, there's still time! Tomorrow's Sunday though and I usually go shopping. Maybe next week?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Americans still being gullible idiots thinking this will do anything while bad actors a running rampant 🤦‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

This time it's really really urgent tho. What a clown country

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Serendipity makes my point for me.

I can think of few crimes higher than making all our allies distrust us.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, didn't expect and answer. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Impeachment lost all meaning long long ago

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, it didn't, in the same way that the existence of liars doesn't diminish the meaning of truth.

Half of Americans are fascist partisans. That sucks, but it doesn't mean ethics don't matter, and pretending otherwise is pathetic.

What impeachment is, at it stands, is futile. No system can function as intended when half of the people in it are bad faith actors.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If we impeach, it needs to be Trump and Vance together.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That just gets us the guy who tells his son when he's watching porn

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

How else would you be able to jerk off together?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

IIRC don't the special elections due to presidential appointments potentially put control of the house up for grabs again? It's been a while since I looked

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good for the American people.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Ultimately won't matter. Even if he's impeached (again) he has too many bootlickers/supporters/fear mongers in the Senate to convict him. It simply won't happen.

load more comments
view more: next ›