this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
83 points (74.3% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6325 readers
55 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Martin Freeman would have been a much better Frodo. Elijah isn't even in the top 100 list of actors that I would cast as Frodo.

The LOTR movies succeeded despite him.

Don't get me wrong, I like Elijah. I just feel that he was miscast in those films.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I think Elijah Wood did a great Frodo, but one very different from the books. Now, the same PJ LOTR but with a middle-aged academic/retired-gardener/country-gentleman as Frodo... that would be interesting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

He's the reason I can't watch the movies. Something about his face is off putting. I don't blame the guy, that's just the face he's got, but it makes me uncomfortable somehow.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I know he looked nothing like the cartoon.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I actually agree with you 100 percent. I really did not like the way Elijah Wood played Frodo. His facial expressions any time he's in pain or scared just ruin the scene for me.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

This would be one of the best unpopular opinions posts Lemmy has had yet ... if you had provided any reasons. Without reasons it's just meh though.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Oh I see, you've mistaken this page for "wrong opinions"

This is for unpopular ones.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

Strong disagree. Take my upvote.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Elijah was not that special but that also gave it a certain charm. The cast around him became more prominent as the "main character" was more of a side character that existed to be escorted.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Production began in October of 1999. I can't find a definitive date for casting but I'm guessing it would have been '99 as well.

Martin Freeman would have been "acting" for all of 2 years with basically 1 short and a couple of minor TV appearances to his name.

Elijah Wood and Sean Astin each had been working for over a decade when cast, with dozens of credits each.

Not saying Martin couldn't have done it (I think he would have nailed the role!), but it would have been a BOLD choice to cast a total newcomer to the lead of your $250M moonshot of a trilogy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Plenty of movies cast newcomers for lead roles, but what are the chances Martin Freeman would be on anyone's radar for the role?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Martin Freeman wasn't a good Bilbo, would have been even worse as Frodo, and a disgrace as Arthur Dent. He was good in Fargo though. And plays a good Watson.

However Martin Sheen would have been magnificent. Watch him in Good Omens - Bilbo to a tea!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Fyi you're thinking of Michael Sheen, not Martin Sheen. I agree though, Michael Sheen would have probably been amazing as Bilbo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Blast! I was sure I'd typed Michael!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

I quite liked him as Arthur Dent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In another timeline, Jared Leto played Frodo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Haha! I would watch that for the unintended comedy!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Whaaat I cant even stand Martin Freeman in The Hobbit. Actually makes it hard to completely let go and enjoy the movie.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

well the hobbit films are horrible, so maybe its more than the actor

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only thing I did not like about casting Elijah Wood (and don’t get me wrong I love him as Frodo) is that he was a bit too young for the role. Frodo is supposed to be in his fifties when he sets out from the Shire. Sam and Merry are about the same age but are more than 10 years younger than Frodo. In age Martin Freeman would have been better but by temperament Elijah was the better Frodo. Bilbo is more of a “fuck it, let’s do this” kind of guy whereas Frodo is much more deliberate and cautious. Martin Freeman was also an amazing choice for Bilbo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Frodo was ageless like Bilbo and gollum due to his proximity to the ring.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

During the 15 or so years when technically Frodo possessed the ring he never used it. The first time he put it on was in Bree. I doubt he was much affected by it during those years.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As time went on, people began to notice that Frodo also showed signs of good 'preservation': outwardly he retained the appearance of a robust and energetic hobbit just out of his tweens. 'Some folk have all the luck,' they said; but it was not until Frodo approached the usually more sober age of fifty that they began to think it queer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Good point. I forgot about that passage.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I misread and now I want to see Morgan Freeman as Frodo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Same, but we are probably just a few years away from getting an AI to make this change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I know it can already be done, but I mean be done easily.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I have to remind myself that some birds aren't meant to be caged. Their feathers are just too bright. And when they fly away, the part of you that knows it was a sin to lock them up DOES rejoice. But still, the place you live in is that much more drab and empty that they're gone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Fuck you making me read with his voice lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As I read that, the dictation voice in my head was all Morgan Freeman.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

well... yes.. its a direct quote from shawshank redemption that morgan freeman spoke in the film

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They just took away all his good lines. Imagine movie Frodo laying down the law to Gollum:

In the last need, Sméagol, I should put on the Precious; and the Precious mastered you long ago. If I, wearing it, were to command you, you would obey, even if it were to leap from a precipice or to cast yourself into the fire. And such would be my command. So have a care, Sméagol!

I think if they had gone with the wise and courageous Frodo from the books then Elijah Wood would have been better at delivering this sort of line than Martin Freeman.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

OH. Ohhh. Is that why Gollum cast himself into the fire? When was that line? Did that command just actually take effect?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I believe it's just intended to be foreshadowing of Gollum's fate, not suggesting that Frodo actually used the ring on him.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

No, I don't think Frodo ever does tell him to jump.

More relevant is that Gollum swore an oath by the Ring not to harm Frodo, and Frodo warns him thay the Ring will hold him to his word cruelly. Then when Gollum does betray Frodo, Bam! Straight in the lava.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I disagree, but I do agree that the character of Frodo wasn't what it could've been.

There's a bit in the behind the scenes stuff where they're recording that part at the very end, Frodo finishing the book and then admitting to Sam about his stab wound never really healing.

They do a take, and Elijah is delivering his lines in that absurdly slow, sleepy way that is both annoying during a watch but endlessly memeable afterwards. And then Peter Jackson is all like "ok let's take it again but this time even slower"

So tldr I blame Jackson for depicting the character as so frustratingly wet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Good point on your part. For my part, he has never been Frodo for me. Not after reading the book so many times since I was a tyke. I don't think Elijah is a bad actor, at all, but he never fit Frodo, at least in my mind. Not in temperament nor in look.

[–] [email protected] 123 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Damn, that's a seriously unpopular one!

But, consider this.

It wasn't so much Elijah by himself that made his Frodo great.

It was the chemistry and dynamic he had with other actors, especially Astin. The way they played off of each other made the movies great. It was synergy. Mind you, Astin killed it as Sam. Just a brilliant performance, and he could have carried anyone as Frodo the way Sam carried Frodo.

But the two of them? Possibly the most amazing duo performance I've ever seen. They made each other better, and the way they expressed the lines together was bloody art. I genuinely don't think there are many actors that could have paired up as well as they did.

Are there other actors that could have done a better Frodo in other ways? I wouldn't argue with anyone that said yes. There's certainly plenty that could have done as well (though Wood does bring a delicate vulnerability to the role that's hard to deny).

I've seen suggestions of alternative casting for every role, but I can't think of any for Frodo and Sam that would have been so magical.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Huh. That's true. I've never even thought to question Sam's casting. Sean Astin is the emotional bedrock of the trilogy. Elemental.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Thank you. I appreciate your perspective so much!

[–] [email protected] 62 points 8 months ago

Alright then, keep your opinions

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago

Finally, a truly unpopular opinion (which I don't share)