He’s the one who wanted to go hardball on Republicans and they couldn’t find anything to stick to him, as hard as they tried.
Dems can do worse and have done much worse.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
He’s the one who wanted to go hardball on Republicans and they couldn’t find anything to stick to him, as hard as they tried.
Dems can do worse and have done much worse.
Sad that this is what it took
Hopefully.
Walz seemed awesome in the debate. Vance and Walz in general were so much more productive than the other two.
Kamala as VP?
Walz Buttigieg or the other way around.
its march 4th. i say we stop voting for seniors over the retirement age.
I think 70 is a good cutoff age. Minimum age is 35, so having a maximum age makes sense. Same goes for Congress and Senate imo.
he should. he was a great pick and far more left than america deserved. he and aoc would be great as a ticket.