Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
The only way the US wins a war with Iran easily, quickly, and without massive losses is if it uses a nuclear weapon. This fact, combined with that Huckabee post comparing Trump to Truman in 1945 and his "evacuate Tehran" and "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER" statements, makes me nervous. Caitlin Johnstone
But I was told that Trump was the international ✌️ peace candidate you guys. Surely, people -- in America 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 -- couldn't have been lying to me.
The more this happens the more "rational" the logic of "I'm obtaining nukes so people don't invade our bomb me" looks -- which is terrible for everyone the whole world over in case you were wondering.
Launching a massive attack on Iran will definitely make them not want to develop nuclear weapons. Genius move
Ok so just attack them again?
Why is it over Breaking Bad? I don't see the connection.
Took the text from a different meme and just slapped it on a new one that doesn't make any sense
this is a repost from yesterday and its still as stupid. there is a difference in fighting someone who is on the brink of geting nukes or fighting someone who has the most nukes on earth
To be fair...
That's why they always say Iran is perpetually 1-5 years away from having nukes.
And why that left Iran with one logical path: actually develop nuclear weapons.
Because even if they don't try. Israel is going to keep saying they're trying, and pre-emptively attacking, until Iran actually launches a nuke. Hopefully in a test capacity at least.
From my understanding they already have all compartments developed (including 60% angereichertes Uran which only use is for making a bomb) but yet stuck to stick it all together. Newer research showed they are more like 1-2 weeks away (well before the Israeli strikes). Now they will be on full Sprint until they either have one or their resources get destroyed/taken. Don't even know what option I prefer nowadays.
Honestly... Yeah, Iran is working towards a nuke, primarily because that would make decapitating their government infeasible (by current standards)
Iran are not the good guys. The Iranian people seem pretty alright TBH, but their government sucks
They are a state that sponsors terrorism for geopolitical objectives
But they're also the party trying to deescalate. Consistently, for several years now. Israel is not. And that's so incredibly shameful
The Iranian people seem pretty alright TBH, but their government sucks
Yeah, and it's not like there's a reason they don't have a democracy or anything...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Iran
I've got very few problems with people, but man, a lot of governments are dog shit these days.
It's important to remember the distinction because actual wars are breaking out and it's always the people that pay the price, rarely the governments