this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
1280 points (99.2% liked)

Greentext

5979 readers
1432 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Florida 🀝 UK

Ridiculous and archaic anti-porn laws

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago

People with humiliation fetishes are gonna love this shit.

[–] [email protected] 271 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Americans now need a wanking license.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yew got a lie-sense for that boner?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What accent was that supposed to be?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least they owned the liberals, right?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (9 children)

It must be real inconvenient to have to turn on a VPN, it's like a whole button that they have to click, Libs totally owned. Meanwhile the actual weird idiots that voted for this can barely operate a mouse and so they actually do have to suffer the consequences of their own decisions.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 152 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is pretense to intrude on other things and more importantly remove the ability to browse pornography anonymously, which is dangerous. I would never use an account to browse a porn site because why would I ever want that data linked back to me? Look at the government right now. You watch a gay or trans porn video and in a few years that could be grounds for never being able to have certain types of jobs or worse, being deemed a β€œmiscreant”

If this was truly about protecting children they would encourage open dialogue on sex in homes and increase inclusive sex education. This is evidence based. It would still be necessary even with this nonsense because obviously vpns exist, as well as amateur run sites, sites run from outside of the USA, torrents, etc that don’t give a shit about us laws requiring age verification and will show all kinds of obscenely hardcore videos

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Soon You'll have to go back to borrowing porn magz from Your friends.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Fucking Jesus. They did say they wanted to ban porn and this is only the first step. This will systematically destroy porn and livelihoods. Who in their right minds would upload a picture of their horny selves next to their licence to some likely unreliable site? Lower the traffic and you kill the shit out of sex work. Evil motherfuckers, man.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 month ago (9 children)

"Verification is carried out by 3rd party". Totally no potential to misuse of collected data.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why no, they specifically mentioned it being highly secure

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Protect my minors?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (6 children)

About time to invest in a VPN

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ive had mullvad on my router for 2 years :p

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I spun up OpenVPN on a Digital Ocean droplet 7-years ago. LOL, no longer have any idea how it works, but it's $6/mo. and never dies. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There have been a number of (I'll admit, not high-risk) security updates since then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yet another republican tax increase.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Eh, I see it as a necessity in the modern age, it's politically agnostic for me. I run a full time VPN as a matter of privacy and security.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Depends on how much other media you consume. If you're forced to get a VPN anyway I bet you're more likely to start looking into pirating everything else, too

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I'd rather go back to (poorly) drawing boobs and stuff...

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I don't care if kids see porn.

If that's the worst thing ever, justifying this invasion of privacy, whoop de shit. Let 'em.

There's a lot worse on the internet. There's a lot worse on daytime television. Blood and guts and cults and informercials. Desirable crude entertainment is obviously not worth locking down the internet. I mean for fuck's sake, at least with "four horsemen" excuses, like terrorism and money laundering, people agree that those things are bad.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago

It's absolutely reprehensible that you think it's okay for a child to see an infomercial

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Let me child see porn or trust a porn site with their photo and IS?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (22 children)

The thing is that by now, plenty of adults grew up watching porn when they were minors, and know that this hasn't been harmful to them... so why are we even still getting laws like that, shouldn't voters and their representatives know better by now...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

These people are not results-oriented.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I'm stealing that for the next time I have to explain that I'm being held up by a third party not doing what they're supposed to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, you're right. But that doesn't fit with their "think of the children" moral compass. Which isn't even pointing the correct direction, but good luck convincing them of that.

I feel like my compass analogy isn't the best, but eh.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A valid response to "think of the children" is "fuck them kids."

It's not enough to politely disagree. Some fucks need to be dismissed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I like this

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This will never be removed. There will only ever going to be more types of websites that have to use this

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

It's a lubed slope

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I wonder if that'll end up being true. I'd guess these constituents represent voters that watch porn at least as much on average as anyone else. I'm going to go ahead and guess above average. They might get tired of this and push for change. But I'm also admittedly less educated on how our political system works than I should be and might be overestimating how much influence Florida Man has because he's disgruntled at having to jump through hurdles to fap.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 130 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Soon they’ll start recording you jerking it to cross reference with previous sessions as identity confirmation.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, they know what parts of what videos you watch, your favorite keywords, time/days patterns, location, I'd say they can train AI on that data

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Can you imagine, training rec algos for porn sites on intensity of movement and facial expressions...

Edit: if this ever happens (and I'm 85% convinced it will in some way), I'll just start crankin' to financial spreadsheets and medication specs, keep'em guessing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

That’s insane

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί