this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
1449 points (97.4% liked)

Greentext

5759 readers
1334 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1449
Murica (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Anons argue in comments

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Collisions can still kill or injure you badly if the other person is driving a car

Also if you accidentally hit someone at speed and their head cracks open on a hard surface they could die

So I'm not entirely sure about that claim

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

1- The dangerous vehicle here is clearly the car, not the bike. You literally made a point in favor of bikes. Also next point would make this scenario basically imposible.

2- The claim was worded as "significantly less likely to kill or even injure", which is factually correct, even with cars into the ecuation. If two cars collide at a high speed, there's a lot more energy in the crash than if a car and a bike collide. I've had quite a few accidents with a bike, some of them including cars and pedestrians, only once I got actually injured on an arm.

load more comments
view more: next ›