this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
451 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

14276 readers
1742 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, but the audience score is at 80%.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

I’m going all in on the potential straight.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Risk is probability times consequence. Focusing on the odds without considering the second half of the equation is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Don't give me hope

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Some examples of very enjoyable related media that are not Don't Look Up include The Last Policeman book trilogy and the Netflix animated series Carol & the End of the World.

(There's nothing wrong with Don't Look Up, but it's the only recommendation I ever see.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Odds are low, but not zero. Still a bit of a nothingburger now that we've been able to successfully land probes on asteroids to sample their contents (and even send back video similar to images taken by Mars rovers). Strap a small thermonuclear warhead to an unmanned probe and redirect its trajectory - not a simple matter but entirely feasible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make a probe with a giant fuel tank and engine land on the asteroid then just fire away to push it slightly off target so it misses the planet. Don't need to destroy just alter the trajectory a tiny bit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You're right, but the nuke is a good backup plan too. Beyond that, the UFO community has been saying for years that NHI's explicitly told human leaders to never use nuclear weapons in space (or else), and I want to know if it's true or not...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wtf, no, the way to deflect an asteroid is to send something near it while it's far away. Blowing it up just risks another smaller asteroid hitting us. Small changes in direction while incredibly fast away will change its path enough to be safe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Holdup, your user avatar can be a GIF too?!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I have no idea, I had this on my computer so I uploaded it and it works. It works on some front ends and apps and not on others. I was just happy with the magic and used it!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Don't even need a warhead. The Double Asteroid Redirect Test (DART) just threw the probe itself at an asteroid hard enough to affect its orbit.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Unmanned? Nah, lets just assemble a team of oil drillers and send them up there like space cowboys.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be easier to train astronauts to drill?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Nah, you see this mission needs someone real smart. And when someone talks about smart people in smart professions, do you think about astronauts? No of course not. (Unless they are really really old astronauts, like geriatric, then yes.) instead you think about rough necks. That's right, you think of guys who drill holes in the ground.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

It'll be easier to teach drillers to fly shuttles than it would be to teach astronauts how to dig a hole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Well it would still have an impact energy less than that of tsar bomba, and probably just hit an ocean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Alabamans are still marrying their cousins.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are you talking about Shelbyville, why would we want to marry our cousins?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes! Eat all of our shorts!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I can't blame them, their cousins are hot.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is it wrong to hope it hits us?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why is that? The planet will be fine without us. It will probably be better off without us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Its not nearly big enough to wipe out the planet. Not even close.

It would just cause suffering for thousands/hundreds of thousands of people. Are you OK with that?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Yeah, because at best it just splashes in the ocean, worst it hits a city and causes mass suffering as thousands die from the impact and fallout. It's not going to end any suffering

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, because it's not going to be nearly as catastrophic as it sounds. What we need is a real world ender.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it wrong to hope it hits the specific city I live in? 😅

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Sometimes hope is all we've got.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I begin to worry when I see this asteroid still in the sky and how it becomes gradually bigger

load more comments
view more: next ›