this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
160 points (97.6% liked)

News

24769 readers
3933 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey sued Starbucks, alleging its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring policies violate anti-discrimination laws and result in slower service and higher prices.

The lawsuit follows Trump's executive order banning DEI programs in the federal government and urging the private sector to follow suit.

Starbucks denied the claims, stating its hiring practices are fair and legal.

While customers have complained about price increases and wait times, analysts attribute these issues to inflation and drink customizations rather than hiring policies.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

If you think this is a waste of time and money, luckily Missouri has set up its own DOGE, so feel free to report it

https://www.senate.mo.gov/committeeforms/GovernmentEfficiency/GovernmentEfficiencyPortal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What are the chances that this actually goes anywhere?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

In a decent world Starbucks would have a great standing to counter sue for being discriminated against for legal business practices.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

This is insulting.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Coffee takes longer to brew if black people make it. This is an UNDENIABLE FACT supported by HARD SCIENCE.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Hey man, the GOP has to show their support to all those KKK members who voted for them

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also somehow cost more too. Scientific

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

Only in Missouri somehow. That's just an objective geographical observation.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

result in slower service and higher prices.

How the fuck is that even relevant?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

It’s racism plain and simple. “Brown” people are slow and ‘can’t work good’ or some shit.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

It’s very relevant when you’re a racist piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It really pisses me off when the cars are backed up but the person in the drive through still has to spend time doing land acknowledgements for each customer and asking them their preferred pronouns. /s

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

On the other hand, Trump's FAA has made airplanes do impromptu land acknowledgements

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

one counter would be that minorities and other under-represented groups are far more experienced at dealing with shit from the whiny, entitled, and often hostile, ~~haters~~white customers, aka 'karens', et al, and thus all else being equal--abilities, skills, etc--are the more qualified for the jobs there in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't mind DEI practices as they have been enacted by most companies I'm aware of. They're meant to make employment decisions more balanced and fair than they have been historically.

That said, one wouldn't hire a minority because other minorities have more experience or are better at handling complaints. One would ask interview questions or seek references for how individuals applying for positions handle these situations. It's almost as if people do not automatically have all the same characteristics as the majority, perceive or otherwise, of their group.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

The problem is that their propaganda machine news sources tell them that DEI means they will hire the lesser, minority applicant over the much, much better white applicant just because they are a minority. The issue is "perception" (in that their perception has been curated for them). You could get every last one of them (save the truly racist) to agree to a system that could be proven to remove race from an identifiable attribute in hiring, not that this is possible in every situation. Sadly, they have been trained to believe that is not the goal for DEI.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago

The racists have been unleashed.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel the massive profit margins and serious under staffing might have more effect, but I'm not an idiot like MAGA politicians.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

That's why Starbucks fills the ranks with women and minorities. They can get away with paying them less.