this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
504 points (94.2% liked)

Asklemmy

47053 readers
1310 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Nah, I prefer using quantum spookiness for that. Send a steady stream of entangled particles to the other person on the moon first. Any time you do something to the particles on Earth, the ones on the Moon are affected also. The catch is that this disentangles them, so you have only a few limited uses. This is why you want a constant stream of them being entangled.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This wouldn't work, entangled particles don't work like that. They would be disentangled the moment you do anything to either particle of the entangled pair. The only time any information can be encoded onto entangled particles is when they're created.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if the stick were made of the hardest known material, the information would take about 7 hours to travel from Earth to the Moon, according to the equation relating Young's modulus and the material's density.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also, even if you could somehow pull the stick, Newton’s Second Law (F = ma) tells us that the force required to move it depends on its mass and desired acceleration. If the stick were made of steel with a 1 cm radius, it would have a mass of approximately 754×10^6kg due to its enormous length. Now, if you tried to give it just a tiny acceleration of 0.01 m/s² (barely noticeable movement), the required force would be:

F = (754×10^6) × (0.01) = 7.54×10^6 N

That’s 7.54 MN, equivalent to the thrust of a Saturn V rocket, just to make it move at all! And that’s not even considering internal stresses, gravity differences, or the fact that the force wouldn’t propagate instantly through the stick.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The motion of the stick will actually only propagate to the other end at the speed of sound in the material the stick is made of.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So when you pull on the stick and it doesnt immediately get pulled back on the other side, you are, at that instant, creating more stick?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're not creating more stick, but you're making the stick longer. The pressure wave in the stick will travel at the speed of sound in the stick which will be faster than sound in air, but orders of magnitude slower than light.

Everything has some elasticity. Rigidity is an illusion . Things that feel rigid to us are rigid in human terms only.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get it. Elasticity isn't something you think about in the every day so it all seems rigid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Exactly. At the atomic level solid matter acts a lot like jello. It also helps explain why things tend to break if you push or pull on them at rates that exceed the speed of sound in that material.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

It would stretch like a rubber band stretches just a lot less. Wood, metal, whatever is slightly flexible. The stick would either get slightly thinner or slightly less dense as you pulled it. Also, you won't be able to pull it much because there's so much stick.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway

You have it backwards: if your stick is unavoidable, NOT HAVING IT is the impossible thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Autocorrected from unfoldable. This is what I get for occasionally browsing on a shitty Amazon tablet. At least it was cheap to the point of being almost free.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For anyone looking for other cool ideas or videos about speed of light etc

What Is The Speed of Dark? - Vsauce (13m:31s)

  • Cool older vsauce video going over shadows and light speed etc

The Faster-Than-Light Guillotine - Because Science (w/ Kyle Hill) (14m:19s)

  • Basically goes over the "FTL Scissor action" that a lot of people have covered but he does a good segment covering it.
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Here's a video that actually kinda answers the question:

https://youtu.be/DqhXsEgLMJ0

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

There's a thought experiment about this in most intro classes on relativity, talking about "length compression". To a stationary observer a fast-moving object appears shorter in its direction of travel. For example, at about 87% of the speed of light, length compression is about 50%. If you are interested in the formula look up Relativistic Length Compression. Anyway, if you are carrying a pole 20 meters long and you run past someone at that speed, to them the pole will only look 10 meters long.

In the thought experiment you run with this pole into a barn that's only 10 meters long. What happens?

The observer, seeing you bringing a 10-meter pole into a 10-meter barn, shuts the door behind you, closing it exactly at the point where you're entirely in the barn. What happens when you stop, and how does a 20-meter pole fit in a 10-meter barn in the first place?

First, when the pole gets in the barn and the door closes, the pole is no longer moving, so now to the observer it looks 20 meters long. As its speed drops to zero the pole appears to get longer, becoming 20 meters again. It either punches holes in the barn and sticks out, or it shatters if the barn is stronger.

Looking at the situation from the runner's point of view, since motion is relative you could say you're stationary and the barn is moving toward you at 87% of the speed of light. So to you the 10-meter barn only looks 5 meters long. So how does a 20-meter pole fit in?

The answer to both questions is compression - or saying it another way, information doesn't travel instantly. When the front end of the pole hits the inside of the barn and stops, it takes some time for that information to travel through the pole to the other end. Meanwhile, the rest of the pole keeps moving. By the time the back end knows it's supposed to stop, from the runner's point of view the 20-ft pole has been compressed down to 5 meters. From the runner's point of view the barn then stops moving, so it's length returns to 10 meters, but since the pole still won't fit it either punches holes in the barn or shatters.

One of my physics profs had double-majored in theatre, and loved to perform this demo with a telescoping pole and a cardboard barn.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What about the speed of the earth's rotation though, could that fuck up the stick holding?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It'll knock the moon and earth out of orbit!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

You're forgetting the speed at which the shockwave from the compression travels through the stick. I guess it's around the speed of sound in that material, which might be ~2 km/s

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The compression on the end of the stick wouldn't travel faster than the speed of sound in the stick making it MUCH slower than light.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But.. But.. The stick is unfoldable!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›