this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
523 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19830 readers
3322 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denied claims that she is secretly wealthy, stating she is worth less than $500,000 and doesn’t trade stocks or take corporate money.

Her financial disclosures show modest savings and student debt.

Some conservatives on X, despite opposing her politics, praised her perceived integrity.

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 hours ago

Absolutely no respect for the people, using the most obvious bullshit trolls now?

Please projrct all the corruption that exists because you were part of commiting it.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

I think if we don't start WW3 and nuke the planet she's gonna be the first woman president in the US

[–] [email protected] 57 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

The DNC would murder her if she broke through their primary defenses and got close enough.

They're fine with losing, the pendulum is part of the grift, what they aren't fine with is losing their half of that bipartisan oligarch gravy train. Our capitalists don't bribe both parties to have those parties stand against economic metastasis at all human cost.

We can have affirmation ribbons and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, or we can have scapegoating and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, that is the extent of our "freedom." Reagan and Kemp saw to that by getting their former opposition on the take.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Slave mentality is an unhealthy coping mechanism.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Good thing I don't have that.

If I did, I'd help protect the system when the molitovs start flying at it like a good house slave, I hope to assist when it isn't just me, as that would just be suicide by cop.

This isn't class war, this is 50 years of class occupation and counting. Peaceful positive change has been made impossible here on multiple levels by the owners. I put my hope in the other thing, as that's the only rational place left to put it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago

I’m betting this is less of a “look at her integrity” and more of a “why would a woman have money” thing

[–] [email protected] 117 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think regardless of whether you are Republican or a Democrat, AOC is probably the closest to what a representative should be. Now whether you agree with her or not is a different discussion entirely, but that's not the point I'm trying to make. She's just the only one that actually seems to give a shit about who she represents. Whereas both for Republicans and Democrats the vast majority of our "representation" are crotchety and corrupt old people that don't give a shit anymore.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

She’s just the only one that actually seems to give a shit about who she represents. Whereas both for Republicans and Democrats the vast majority of our “representation”

While I agree with almost everything you said, there's really no good reason to make a statement like that and leave Bernie in with the "vast majority" group. 🙂

The man has walked the walk for a very long time. (Yes he's too old to run for office now, but he deserves his due!)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#Political_activism

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (9 children)

Most Americans want progressive policies, they're just convinced from Cold War propaganda that progressivism/socialism is always the opposite of good.

Bernie stopped running for president after the DNC told him to. He's proven he doesn't have what it takes to stand for his principles in a presidential run.

I loved Bernie, even donated to him twice, but he's a coward and only does lip service these days.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Bernie stopped running for president after the DNC told him to.

What do you mean by this?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I saw a recent interview Bernie did with AOC and I learned that she got into politics specifically because she was inspired by Bernie during his presidential run in 2016. Thats something I didn't realize and it explains a lot why we feel a lot of the same energy from them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

That's a pretty interesting thing to know, thanks for mentioning it!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

My bad. Wasn't trying to throw Bernie aside. He's fantastic as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

All good, I wasn't throwing shade on you just wanting to put in a word for the Bern. 🙂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Naive of You thinking, there will be an election in2028.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 12 hours ago

Man, if you don’t agree with her views, fine whatever. But for people to hate her so much to claim she’s corrupt when she’s clearly not is just silly.

We live in a stupid timeline. More politicians should be like her. We’d all be better off, regardless of which party they were from.

[–] [email protected] 288 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

AOC feels like the only hope America has at any improvement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

she's the real deal, but i fear she's been too vilified by the diaper and his cult, and the far-right wastes of humanity that broadcast all the bullshit that enable him, to make successful run for the white house.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

And Trump hasn’t been vilified?

Vilification doesn’t matter, getting people to turn up matters.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Any effective progressive is going to be vilified. They will be attacked from all sides, and all of their dirty laundry will be made public. Every flaw, every misstep, every gaff, all of it will be blown out of proportion by the machine they threaten.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I hope that we can also get a younger white male progressive to work along side her. Not because I think they'd be better, but it might help draw emotionally fragile men who can't accept a woman in charge. Also, it would mean another progressive reaching the masses, which is always good.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I'm glad it seems that many democrats are quitting their Gatekeeping bullshit with AOC.

So frustrating to see people so concerned about the perception of some strawman caricature the right manufacture for our best fighters that we turn on our own. If it wasn't obvious, they attack her so relentlessly because they fear her and know her potential more some of our own.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

What is this gatekeeping about AOC?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I'm more moderate and have always respected AOC, but thought she was too extreme to make a good president. I genuinely believe that the president should be someone who wants to build coalitions and steer the country towards a better future without allowing it to fracture. I still believe that, but I recognize now that my way of thinking can't win elections in this modern era of politics. Now is the time for a firebrand - someone who would rather lose than compromise. I would still be worried about civil war if AOC became president, but I'm already worried about that now, so no point in holding it against her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

A thought I had a few days ago,

The left is all about inclusivity and forgiveness unless you've made any amount of mispropriety, then it's a race to drop you as quick as possible.

The right is all about being held accountable for your transgressions, law and order, you do the crime you pay the time, but they have 0 cares about their leaders being held accountable.

I feel like each party is the watchdog for the others politicians, and the left is way too accepting of the right wings transgressions, while the right wing hammers the left as quick and hard as possible (except we just do it to ourselves!)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (9 children)

We would need 60 of her in the senate, or literally anybody else on the blue team, for America to have any hope. Otherwise Republicans will filibuster any spec of salvation.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I’m also a Jasmine Crockett from Texas fan.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

A millionaire lawyer who

was named as co-chair of the 2024 Harris-Walz campaign and is currently a part of the Democratic Congressional Progressive Caucus.

While giving her husband huge security contracts and buying houses in Hawaii?

Hard pass

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

For texas, that's a step in the right direction lol.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Go on you valiant crusader.

Continue to shit on anyone who isn't perfect,

Please let us know when you find the correct candidate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I did, it was AOC. I said so up above.

The last thing anyone needs right now is more of the same Democrats who never walk the walk, we need more AOCs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean let's be honest with ourselves: Anyone who had any relation with the braindead mess that was the Walz-Harris campaign should be instantly made out of consideration.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Walz seemed like a pretty decent choice and I liked him a bit. Is there something I'm not realizing about him?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking more about the absolutely moronic way the campaign was run than the candidates themselves. Harris and Walz themselves were salvageable (sans Gaza, they were genuinely hopeless there) but anyone who was involved in actually running the campaign and deciding the platform is either braindead or a corporate stooge and either way shouldn't be allowed anywhere near future elections.

Also to answer your question Walz is the "Israel has a right to expand its borders" guy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Take a peep into Jeff Jackson, NC AG. Hoping for big things out of him.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Just looked him up and he looks shit.

AOC is great because she is outspoken and holds actual left wing values compared to 99.9% of her party.

This clown seems like a Kamala-lite with his boasting on his law enforcement and military service history.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›