this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
62 points (95.6% liked)

Canada

10115 readers
471 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'm already getting aggressively tailgated where I live when I follow the 40km/h limit. I don't see this going well, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

30 is crazy slow, either make more pedestrian paths or allow the cars, not 30 everywhere, remove the vehicle lanes if you have to, one way conversions maybe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Speed doesn't get you around faster in urban areas, especially not in residential neighbourhoods, because stop signs and traffic lights (when not ignored) extend your trip more.

That's why as a cyclist, I'm often catching up to cars going 3-4x faster than me. And when cars are queued up at stops, I'm often passing those "fast" cars, too.

But 30km/h is less likely to kill people, which is a good thing.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So how much time will this add to most trips, in the end?

Edit: I have no formed opinion on this policy. I don't even know which side is downvoting me, lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

People are downvoting you because your question is implying driver delays are not worth the increase in safety. Drivers are often protesting nearly anything that slows them down even when that thing slowing them down has been proven to save lives.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Not much overall I would guess. Most people going 60-70 in a 50 zone usually just end up getting to the next red light faster, wasting their gas and wearing down their brakes faster.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Literally nobody will obey this.

I'm not in Vancouver itself, but a major road near me had its speed limit dropped to accommodate mixed-use expansions. Not a single driver actually does the new speed limit. They all speed 20-30kph over the limit and they will tailgate you or highbeam flash if you do the posted limit.

Maybe some day in the distant future our policy-makers will understand that updating a few signs doesn't make a damn difference. You need physical speed reduction methods such as speedbumps, roundabouts, raised crosswalks, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They actually changed the road to accommodate mixed usage while lowering it? Lucky you!

Here there just taking big roads designed for 50, and making them 40 with zero plans to change the roadway to encourage the lower speed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

What about just enforcement?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe some day in the distant future our policy-makers will understand that updating a few signs doesn’t make a damn difference.

Yes it does, even if compliance is low, and the reason is what you yourself is saying

You need physical speed reduction methods such as speedbumps, roundabouts, raised crosswalks, etc.

Traffic engineers won't do these road diets on 50km/h streets. Changing the speed limit is an important first step that enables further changes to road infrastructure to help enforce the updated speed limits. This sweeping change is a MAJOR victory, that has been argued for many years. That we were able to pass this for so many neighbourhoods at once is great news and should be celebrated.

This was discussed at length during the council meeting, including later in the same day where another vote was passed to update the commitments and plans for the municipal Vision Zero initiative, which are in fact going to require infrastructure projects.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Fully closing some streets to vehicle traffic also helps. It not only reduces collisions but also increases vehicle throughput.

The change in Vancouver is specifically aimed at minor streets though, where other traffic calming measures are usually already in place. And the reduced speed is a climate measure more than a safety measure.