this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
440 points (98.9% liked)

World News

32862 readers
361 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Look, I know that immigration is a contentious issue, but sanctioning a country for not repatriating its citizens is a disproportionate response. Trump and Co. are really obsessed with immigration to even do this. It says a lot what values they have.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He does that to strongarm companies into complying, because it works. It's also setting an example for other countries to cooperate.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I suppose, but we're talking about international diplomacy. And a modern one at that.

Trump's strong arming sounds so 19th century though. His open threat of taking Panama canal, Canada, Greenland, and renaming the Gulf of Mexico is so manifest destiny.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

You expect "reasonable" from the orange idiot?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a response to make them do it. And it worked. They caved.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I just saw the news that Colombia gave in.

Trump is going all in. He's reverting to the 19th century way of strong arming other countries over petty things. He's reviving the old-school capitalist imperialism.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If they won't take them, maybe we could put all these Columbians in some sort of District. A District of Columbia filled with criminals. Wait, we already have that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe the US should take back the US members of ISIS that have been left (along with the people from the other nations that joined ISIS) for the Kurds to keep.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He didn't quite stick the landing on his "destroy the US empire" speedrun last term, but he wasn't idle over the last 4 years and has come out the gate with a strong strategy this time around!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How does this destroy the US empire? It worked, Colombia caved within minutes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

"Criminals they forced into the United States" = "Invasion"

"Repatriation" != "Deportation"

Repatriation is what happens when you return a POW to their country of origin. Deportation is when you return a criminal to their country of origin.

POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system. They can be held indefinitely without charges, or returned to their country of origin, without judicial oversight. Since deportation is a judicial process, POWs are not subject to deportation.

POWs are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of US law; Trump is arguing that the children of "invader-immigrants" can't be citizens.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The term repatriation is not in any way exclusive to POWs. It was, for example, used extensively during COVID when talking about voluntary repatriation of expats to their home countries.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

True. I should have been more clear: Deportation requires the involvement of the judicial branch. Repatriation has no such requirement. "Repatriation" is a more generic term for returning to one's country of origin.

I did not mean to suggest that "repatriation" was exclusive to POWs, and I apologize if I gave that impression. I meant to distinguish between judicial and non-judicial.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 days ago (3 children)

As opposed to the legal kind.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

That would be Wall Street

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He's the president of the United States

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

HereBeter is saying that trump is a legal criminal... you know, since he has been found guilty of many crimes, yet hasn't had to have any consequences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Clown gonna clown

[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Cool, more tariffs to punish…us?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

His base see it as him punishing Columbia and they'll later be surprised at how much some things cost and blame liberals for it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (5 children)

You're behind the news. Colombia caved within minutes. No tariffs. The idea was to push them to take their citizens back, and it worked.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›