CyberMonkey404

Which I'm sure had nothing to do with satellite targeting, air support, artillery and missiles and oh Iraqi army leadership getting bribed to flee

Well depends on which war. They could hit objects that will hinder Russian ability in future conflicts with other NATO lapdogs - see for example strikes on nuclear warning radars. Plus there's a history of successful drone attacks on Russian airfields (because for some reason jets are stored in the open there). Those jets are used for retaliatory strikes

What was he doing in Ukraine last year, I wonder? An active warzone. How'd he even get there to begin with? Excuse me while I unroll my tinfoil

So much for the global south solidarity

Behind you

Took them long enough

old designs like T-72/80/

Leopard 2 entered production in 1979. Abrams entered service in 1981. They are just as old

Rubbish, it was never dominant to begin with

You mean more so than actual NATO troops on the ground, direct feeds and targeting data from drones, missiles and naval drones that require approval to be armed and fired?

Idk, what about it?

350 million

Crud, I don't have those