this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
280 points (97.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
3672 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • The University of Waterloo is expected to remove smart vending machines from its campus.
  • A student discovered an error code that suggested the machines used facial-recognition technology.
  • Vending Services said the technology didn't take or store customers' photos.
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago

I hope the company, Vending Services, lose more from the PR blowback than whatever they gained by incorporating this BS into their machines. One university is a start, where else does this company operate?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That is awesome

[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Is there any rational reason why vending machines need to be that complicated?

Card readers / contactless payment were easy enough to "bolt on" to existing models (they had them when I was in college back in the stone age). So that's not a sufficient reason.

There are some "new" features I find useful, such as detecting when an item fails to vend. But those are pretty much just IR "tripwires" that detect the falling product; if it doesn't trip, then you get refunded or can make another selection.

I just cannot fathom why vending machines need any of this extra crap.

Feel free to enlighten me if you're in the know.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I can tell you why, as no one here seems to have used these. These are rooms of food items with no workers. Say 10 fridges and other items like apples, bananas, coffee machines microwaves etc sitting out. You walk up, grab what you want, use what you want and then check yourself out. It would be wrong to sell any user data but they did this because they were losing money trying to staff lunch rooms. It costs less to ditch warm/cooler food, and rather balance food loss off these items who know they are being filmed and will likely be expelled from the college for stealing. An example woukd be Gulf Coast State College

Instead of thinking vending machine, think food court with self checkout. (Saw this both in a FL colllege and also had this at a private company in TN)

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It might be advertisements. Some newer gas stations/grocery stores have ads playing on the refrigerated section and when it detects someone on front of the door it will go clear or show a picture of what's behind the door.

It's completely ridiculous but it's where things are going now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yes. I saw a video about Japanese vending machines and they talked about these cameras being used to help with targeted advertising, either by knowing the person or identifying their demographics and selling to that.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We desperately need a CALM Act, but for the visual medium. Ugh. Things have been out of hand for too long now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I fully agree. We're bombarded with enough distractions throughout the day. We don't need more right in front of our faces while we're trying to do chores.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Or even trying to relax on the beach

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

MathNews reported that Invenda Group's FAQ list said that "only the final data, namely presence of a person, estimated age and estimated gender, is collected without any association with an individual."

Makes sense why the machine owner would seek this information either for their own use or to sell to others in related fields. Maybe they can use it combined with records of product sales (vs. a very literal form of window-shopping) to identify areas more likely than others to bring consistent returns on the investment of placing, stocking and servicing the machines based on the age/gender statistics of nearby population centers.

Doesn't mean I'd want to be part of their dataset or would be comfortable allowing their installation in a facility where that decision was up to me though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

At this point it costs more money to make a "dumb" vending machine. The cost of a SBC is nothing, and it has more than enough horsepower to process transactions. All that extra horsepower + a 10 cent camera could be used to generate more money with facial recognition so naturally they're gonna spend the extra 10 cents + cost to drill a hole to do it. It's practically free to do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Accounts tied to school ID card? That way you can’t steal someone’s and use theirs, just polls a database and correlates your picture to your id image or something.

About the only use case I can think of for a school.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

At least in the case covered by the article, they don't appear to be doing that:

... the director of technology services for Adaria Vending Services^[1]^ told MathNews that "an individual person cannot be identified using the technology in the machines."

Still possible if they're being less-than-perfectly-honest in that statement, they invest more into the technology or with another machine/company somewhere else.

1

... the smart vending machines... [are] provided by Adaria Vending Services and manufactured by Invenda Group.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Oh definitely isn’t, just an example of how it can be used. I’ve seen it used in plants to administer safety gear so people don’t use a dozen gloves a week, even though it’s free and provided.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That statement sounds weasely as fuck.

The technology in that specific machine cannot identify a user, does not mean the machine does no store or transmit the footage to be processed on another machine or system that can.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

"It does not engage in storage, communication, or transmission of any imagery or personally identifiable information,"...

The linked article includes this statement from Invenda, the manufacturer of the machines. Still have to rely on their truthfulness but they do address that specific point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This definitely couldn’t backfire. Can’t think of a single reason in recent memory why someone’s face wouldn’t be visible… 🤔

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

So it defaults to a pin after if you forget to remove your sunglasses.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"What's most important to understand is that the machines do not take or store any photos or images, and an individual person cannot be identified using the technology in the machines," the statement said. "The technology acts as a motion sensor that detects faces, so the machine knows when to activate the purchasing interface — never taking or storing images of customers."

The statement said that the machines are "fully GDPR compliant," referring to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation. The regulation is part of the EU's privacy legislation that determines how corporations can collect citizens' data.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

You gotta read through the carefully worded line toeing bullshit though; fingerprint readers on timeclocks no longer store fingerprint images but they can sure as fuck identify your finger. If operating similarly, it likely stores your face as a unique value, and can track unique purchases. Importantly, this can be sent to other machines to identify customers anywhere, and then of course, if that same technology is used in other machines, well shoot, any purchase you make at a vending machine is tracked to your face.

The statement says individual purchases cannot be tracked to the individual but could be wordsmithing this with implication of anonymity but in actuality you're tracked by a value. Also, if this were true why was this done so surreptitiously? They will claim I'm court an individual can't be identified but of course once the technology is commonplace it would be only too easy for corps to join a data broker orgy and find out who's who.

I don't know what is in the GDPR related to the above, but Cameras and storing pictures are old hat. Could be that carefully worded shit was because it's not technically a picture of you and also because they'll delete it upon request.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So facial recognition in this case means that it can recognize that a face exists? No particular details but just a face? That's a lot less egregious than I assumed from the headline. With all the AI stuff going on these days, I assumed it was some kind of data mining operation

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

But then, why? Is there a problem with birds and dogs making purchases at these machines that they need to identify a face?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It does also estimate age and gender, so there's some potential for data mining. But not much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah but I wonder how far they would push their next generation versions…